Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

EU New Soviet Union? New, with Biography of Bukovsky

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,349
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 13, 2009

This 5-star video by Vladimir Bukovsky has been reproduced by Habeas Corpus Canada with an English-language trailer giving a short biography of Bukovsky, and a few words on North American Union, scheduled for 2010, as a stage on the way to world government, and the end of nations.

A quote from Gorbachev, offered by Charlotte Iserbyte, confirms the opinion of Bukovsky that the European Union is the new Soviet Union, and we therefore have the same end to fear for Canada and for the United States of America:

"Former President of the Soviet Union Gorbachev on March 23, 2000, in London, referred to the European Union (EU) as "the New European Soviet. If he refers to the EU in that way, it only stands to reason that he would refer to the North American Union (NAU) as the New American Soviet, since the NAU is modeled on the EU. Gorbachev also said in his speech to the Soviet Central Committee on November 2, 1987, published by Novosti Press Agency Publishing House:

We are moving toward a new world, the world of communism. We shall never turn off that road.

Source: THE NORTH AMERICAN 'SOVIET' UNION By Charlotte Iserbyt, February 27, 2007, NewsWithViews.com http://www.newswithviews.com/iserbyt/iserbyt36.htm

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (crazyforcanada)

  • Bulshit this guy lost the russian election and he is angry because he asked EU suport for the campaign but the EU refused

  • Google this, and the Gomberg map comes up:

    "scribd 13846978 Maurice Gomberg"

  • I love Europe. I love the EU. BUT I agree with this man: if Europe realy want's to evolve, it should become more democratic. Away with those Soviets in the council.

  • I recently translated a French article into English on the subject of the 2005 European Constitution, I think it still has relevance re the lack of democracy in that system. For the link to it, Google this:

    00011179057c90af30ae1

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (15)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • So Gorbachev was then spouting rubbish when he called it "The New European Soviet"?

  • That's just rubbish.

    The very concept of EU or "Paneurope" has always been strongly anti-Soviet and anti-communist.

    In fact the very people who came up with the idea of EU have been working for years on undermining communist countries.

    Much of the so called "dissidents" were spies, criminals, corrupt politicians and intellectuals who just needed to help out and finally make it somewhere abroad.

    EU is American SNAFU outlet.

    Mont Pelerin, Paneurope, Le Cercle... no commies there...

  • Bukovsky is not the only one who sees the EU as Soviet. Gorbachev himself called the EU the "New Soviet". And Professor Cuddy, Ph.D., has collected 100 sources tracking the deliberate development of a move toward communist world government (new world order) going back to 1912. In fact, it goes farther back. Moreover, see the MAP drawn up by Maurice Gomberg in 1941, a communist planetary federation where the EU & North America, Africa, Asia, S.America, are ALL Soviet "unions". Coming true.

  • Vladimir Bukovsky didn't "lose" the Russian election. He had run a campaign with a large number of supporters. The existing government legislated a requirement to find 200,000+ signatures of supporters inside of 2 weeks in order to remain in the race, and as Mr. Bukovsky is not a rich man and had no means of recruiting 200,000 signatures in 2 weeks, he was obliged to withdraw. And very honourably.

  • The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

    Those leading the European Union really believe they are doing the right thing.

    The issue is they cannot accept that the destination is out of the hands of any individual or group of rulers and will always be the same.

    Geopolitics self-organises.

    It's the law of mass action and the law of unintended consequence. The inevitable consequence is tyranny, turmoil and failure.

    Self-belief causes politicians to ignore the patterns of history.

  • Interesting...................­........

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more