Leninism vs Fabianism: Two Branches of Collectivism [Part 3]
Top Comments
All Comments (15)
-
Not a bad description of Leninism, I agree that it hurts more than it has ever helped. But let's be serious for a second: reformist Socialism is hardly a nefarious, wretched scourge to be met with sword and shield.
Where revolutionary socialism demands that you accept its principles by staring at you down the barrel of a gun, reformist socialists merely give you the choice of enacting their policies in a democratic fashion. In other words, they let you say no and accept that answer if given.
-
wow 4 videos and none of them talk about ideas, all trying to sound as reasonable as possible deamonise there enemies and say nothing about politics at all pointless
-
There is one common denominator to all these "isms". Rotchschild askenazi-jews, khazar-jews. These are the fucking problem.
-
For America, this means the government applies the Fabian method, as opposed to the old Soviet way which is still used in many less developed areas. The Fabian method encroaches with psychological warfare, propaganda, and trauma to achieve 'mind control'. Fabians have set up shop all around America, might as well call it the Fabian Collective States of America. They got the USA all mixed up, now they want to make every individual into international property under authority of one group mind.
-
Not picking on Lenin.
This approach is as ancient as Humanity itself.
It scales to the average Human.
Power, or at least perceived power is apparently the "Holy Grail" of life.
-
Leninism = A means to an end.
And what is the end? Power.
Doesn't bode well for Humanity, does it?
Final analysis? Lenin didn't have the first idea what inspired Humanity.
His wet dream was to be in control. Period.
-
All Fabians did was act as a party of the people gradually winning them over.
Sure you know to whom i refer!
Fabians came on the scene in 1884 since then working in their gradualist way to CHANGE the Western world.
-
Fabians are working hard to destroy the British constitution.
By taking the powers away from the monarch.
Today they intend to bring in a bill of rights.
Hoping that Brits don't know they already have one, the 1689 English bill of rights.
This bill allows us all the rights we require.
Including one to prevent entry into Europe.
No foreign power can ever rule England!
This plus rights on the Christian religion is in the way of Fabians, Our Government today!!
Plenty info just search.
-
That was Edmund Burke.
-
yes, but there is a big difference between monopoly capitalism and free market capitalism. Monopoly capitalism is more in line with collectivist ideology. Free market capitalism is the opposite but most leftists fail to to make that distinction.
I not even going to try and type something intelligent, I'm only going to say to words. "HOLY SHIT" O_O
Trapinnewyork44 4 years ago 6
I was amazed when I worked it all out. It's mind-blowing - Communism, not Capitalism is to blame.
School leavers in Britain do not even know that England has a constitution thanks to Fabianism...
FatherWarhol 4 years ago 5