Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Pull It?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
34,342
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 6, 2006

UPDATE: Since I have uploaded this video in June of 06, I've realized that this video I edited is misleading in a way. Building 6 was "pulled" down by cables. There is no debating this, I have seen the full video. This should NOT be used as evidence of anything in regards to 911. Only that the demolition term "pull", obviously means pulling the building down with cables.

EXCERPT FROM: http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/pullit.html

Although many people are convinced that Silverstein's statement is an admission that he and the fire department commander conspired to demolish the building, the statement fails to support a case for such a crime. * The common assertion that "pull" is industry slang for demolition lacks support. A Google search for the term "pull" in relation to controlled demolition fails to return uses of "pull" meaning demolition outside of the widely circulated story of Silverstein's admission on 9/11 conspiracy sites. See the analysis on wtc7.net. * Even if "pull" were industry slang for demolition, there would be no reason to expect Silverstein to know this. * The above quote by a Ground Zero worker about pulling Building 6 is not evidence that "pull" means controlled demolition, since he was apparently referring to using cables to literally pull down portions of the building.

A more sophisticated interpretation of Silverstein's comment is that it is bait, eliciting the widespread circulation of an interpretation that is easily denied if not refuted. While failing to provide substantial evidence for the controlled demolition of WTC 7, the story has functioned to eclipse the overwhelming case for demolition based on the physical characteristics of the collapse documented in photographs and videos of the event and the rubble pile that resulted. Those visual documents establish that the building's collapse was an implosion exhibiting all of the features of a standard controlled demolition, including: * Very rapid speed of fall * Symmetric collapse around its vertical axis * Production of large quantities of dust * Collapse into a small, consolidated rubble pile, with exterior walls lying on top

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 10 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (282)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @jhodgski I'm with you bro. Also, no planes crashed into WTC 1 and 2. This was just CGI lies. Keep telling the message

  • Regardless of how au fait Silverstein may be with possible industry slang, what else could he have meant by "pull it".

    I doubt he meant, "pull the firemen out" as there were no firemen in WTC7 when he had his supposed "pull it" conversation.

    Great video here of Larry Silverstein being confronted with his own lies... watch?v=84doiQHJ5rQ

  • Everyone at the Sears Tower, get out while you still can. Larry owns the lease for that building too.

    Check out this guy's channel. user/pullitlarry

  • there is no debating this?.

    .

    The only thing not up for debate is you're cluelessness.

    .

    wooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

  • for the "patriots" outhere.. who like to debunk any conspirator and remain skeptic of 911.

    watch Ted Gunderson videos.. on youtube..former FBI chief.. says not only 911 was inside job..but most terrorist atacks done againts americas. incredible but true. No investigation ever in 911 or any other attacks will get any credible results as long the people in power continues in their jobs positions.. The president is not the real power there..

  • he could have told.. yeah i did the order to use explosives to take down building7... then people will say.. he really means.. this or that. will not have made much diference , most americans are trained to think exactly the way their goverment wants. . people don't question anything. if they do they call it conspirators. hard evidence means nothing there.. we will see sometime in future an american revolution once people get tired there of the corruption n the way their money is invested.

  • Try typing "Pull It",not "pull" numb skull that's the term they use.I don't know anything about controlled Demo, but I've heard the term from documentaries about that profession.I don't believe that WTC1 and 2 were brought down by Controlled Demo....WTC 7 ???

    "Even if "pull" were industry slang for demolition, there would be no reason to expect Silverstein to know this" .....Unless he was informed on how to bring it down.

    Here's more crap America open wide.

  • all the 'truther' videos are the same: first they show you some examples of controlled demolition, then they show the falling of building 7. so what they do is to 'train' your brain in recognizing the similarities between those videos, that's just plain old NLP. look at what is really happening! unbiased and with an open mind.

    the 'pulling' only refers to the taking down of building 6 btw.

  • #5 burned longer and allot more then any yet never fell , Wake up

  • So they where "pulling" only the parts that remain on the outside rim of a deep deep hole that should NOT be there.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more