вот так уничтожают танки

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
761,452
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 12, 2008

ракетный удар по танку

  • likes, 85 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (511)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • A weapon rated at 800mm penetration can easily deal with armor rated in excess of 1000mm simply because those numbers are based on ENTIRELY DIFFERENT principles and calculations. Can also be the other way around, a weapon rated at 1000mm can FAIL to penetrate armor rated at identical thickness, it might fail altogether doing do damage at all when the jet fails to form properly or is disrupted for example.

  • 2ndly RHAe vs HEAT is based typically on copper liner type weapons of assumed performance. The RHAe number is invalid if the weapon is noticeably different in characteristics or, now rather common, uses another type of liner material like molybdenum, DU or tungsten. Its identical for weapon performance estimates.

    In short: Tank RHAe numbers and weapon performance numbers do NOT mean anything.

  • RHAe numbers mean totally jackshit as they are merely estimated on a piece of paper given the average density of the armor in a set of assumed standardized conditions using the basic physics formula of impact depth. The set of conditions varies from country to country, in the US its based on a 30 degree oblique shot to begin with effectively increasing the end number by 15%, coupled with the fact that they lie a lot i wouldnt believe a single number they give.

  • ВЕСЕЛО ТАК.......С МУЗЫЧКОЙ ......ПО АМЕРСКИ МЕРЗКО )))

  • @beltar2 Второе: равное бронирование, это, конечно, хорошо. Но вот у снарядов разная бронепробиваемость по этому самому бронированию. и Последствия пробития этого самого бронирования весьма разные как для танков, так и для экипажей.

  • @beltar2 затыкать не надо мнея это раз. То что будет меньше и легче обыкновенная недоказуемая демагогия, ибо сравниваем характеристики того что есть, а не характеристики того что было бы если. Про составы сплавов - опять же привет кэпу. Точный состав сплава даже кузова Лады Калины не известен. Ну а цифры эквивалентов на то и цифры эквивалентов чтобы ими оперировать.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more