Its because its the sharks there the biggest pussies in the world and get everything called there way and you dumb fuck shark fans know it you cant deny it
Yeah this would be more Goalie Interference than the one the called against him against the blackhawks last week. Inconsistency by refs is annoying. The league still can't figure out the hit-to-the-head penalties. And don't even get me started on what they call hooking these days - though that is on the owners...
i tried to post the rule here, but i'm not going to spread it out over two messages...the marleau contact can be considered "incidental" even though not much other than his own footwork caused him to fall in the crease. nothing in the rulebook (rule 69, which addresses goaltender interference to be exact) gives a reason as for why this would not be a good goal. fact is: you must interefere with the goaltedners ability to make a play for it to be a violation. marleau didn't do that.
Its because its the sharks there the biggest pussies in the world and get everything called there way and you dumb fuck shark fans know it you cant deny it
orangesoda578 1 day ago
@richardhugger12 yah and black... since when do black people play hockey, and there good
TheMrDyrdek 6 days ago
@TheMrDyrdek Ok bud, your team's toughest player is p.k. subban
richardhugger12 6 days ago
Yeah this would be more Goalie Interference than the one the called against him against the blackhawks last week. Inconsistency by refs is annoying. The league still can't figure out the hit-to-the-head penalties. And don't even get me started on what they call hooking these days - though that is on the owners...
sjsteelshark 2 weeks ago
yup ur right the refs are idiots
69nimster 1 month ago
haha price is a huge faggot here
anonanon556 1 month ago
@DK7Seconds He's not a cunt, hes a fuckin amazing goalie... All the sharks players are fag pussys
TheMrDyrdek 1 month ago 2
Big Joe!
DrinkSkateSleep 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hahaha price is a little cunt anyway, go sharks
DK7Seconds 3 months ago
i tried to post the rule here, but i'm not going to spread it out over two messages...the marleau contact can be considered "incidental" even though not much other than his own footwork caused him to fall in the crease. nothing in the rulebook (rule 69, which addresses goaltender interference to be exact) gives a reason as for why this would not be a good goal. fact is: you must interefere with the goaltedners ability to make a play for it to be a violation. marleau didn't do that.
jmiller7742 3 months ago