WikiLeaks Release 1.0 (6/7)
Top Comments
All Comments (42)
-
@wildetaube Thanks for clearing that up, Wilde, good to know you're here to be judge, jury and exocutioner for the rest of us. Douche.
-
why has this not had many views
-
@1j2a3s4m5i6n and america ,never will be. were not as useless and weak as you. you sound as if your country gets invaded everyday. grow a military [balls] and a sound economy. whos going to fuck with you then. its always the same whiners.''were weak, so everyone else must be too'' its not fair lol.
-
@ISAhub why do you jeep hiding at my page? keep it on the vid. y7ou too afraid that others will see the humiliation i put you through. i never needed to leave a love letter. but then again ive never been humiliated. the irony is, you posted me. ha ha.
-
the truth is out ashe brethern!
-
@chrisholland They were right to do so, but the researchers didn't falsify any data. The data were released, and it showed that there wasn't any falisification and that the internal working of the UEA CRU were consistent with how they presented themselves externally. If anything, it upheld their credibility!
Countries are being nazis, and dont want US to KNOW the TRUTH, but poisoning us with false MEDIA, do NOT believe EVERYTHING they show on TV. Believe in WIkiLeaks.
Shadowburn110 2 years ago 34
It sounded like the chick who asked the question was upset that the Wikileaks dudes published the emails. THEY WERE RIGHT TO DO SO. Those lying climate researchers should hang their heads in shame for falsifying data.
chrisholland 2 years ago 25