Drop Hammer and Feather on the Moon

What happens when you drop Hammer and Feather on the Moon. Will they fall at different rate or same?

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Aviation
• Space
• Brain
• Bites
• Astronomy
• Xilence

[5953056]

You welcome and best of luck with your homework.

[zambi007i]

@yesiamawizardjonny (contd)

can't survive beyond the van allen radiation doughnut. and since there must be some evidence of having landed on the moon in the absence of any such, the videos would have been made.

[zambi007i]

@yesiamawizardjonny

nasa definitely did not fake the moon missions but have faked the video. i believe the apollo missions were as real as icing on a cake. but the videos show up so much anomalies that they look like having been taken here on the earth under "carefully planned" circumstances because films (contd)

my point is even a 'dead' feather is organic until it withers off. but no organic material, living or otherwise, would not have been charred to coal under the deadly solar radiation.

[yesiamawizardjonny]

@zambi007i It was a real feather, but it was attached to a ball-bearing and fell as fast as the hammer in the studio. All they needed to do then was just slow the footage down. NASA faked it, bro. Anyone with a brain knows that...

[yesiamawizardjonny]

You know that's not actually the moon, right? Check out my video, "Apollo Moon Landing Hoax: The Case of the Missing Tracks."

[zambi007i]

@shananagans5 my point is: the feather might be 'dead' but it still has organic material inside. and radiation exposure is like deep roasting anything organic. even inorganic matter like iron rods, plastics, ceramics &c get dangerously radioactive when exposed to such a source.

a physics lesson: there's one and the only thing that protects us here on earth from deadly solar radiation: 20k of atmosphere. now the question is does (did) moon have an atmosphere? over to you, dude!

[zambi007i]

@shananagans5 ha ha, that was a good one! ok, try this experiment if you've got the resources. i did this in my univ physics lab.

took some rooster and pigeon feathers, put them inside a vacuum flask under a perforated disc, depressurized the flask and then kept the depressurized flask in line with a cobalt-60 radio source.

in under two minutes the feathers went from brown to black - charcoal black. the end result wasn't very pleasing :-|.

[shananagans5]

@zambi007i Is this a serious question? You are aware the radiation isn't really going to effect something That's already dead. Last time I checked the bird wasn't still attached to the feather.

[Regards200800]

NASA.COM!!!

[BadBoriBoy]

@zambi007i : either way that experiment will give you the same exact results on Earth, outside, and within 5 tries or less w/o heavy winds.

[zambi007i]

nobody in this world sane and with physics knowledge even cares to mention the "lunar" hammer & feather mockery. who knows even if the feather wasn't made of lead? did scott demonstrate the feather to be an "actual" falcon feather, soft as here on the earth.

my challenge is how did nasa manage to preserve an organic part on the moon with solar radiation not damaging it? or was it an artificial feather made of "radiation-proof" material? explanations, scientific, needed here!