Modern Cosmology versus the Bible

http://www.eternal-productions.org/101science.html

Category:

Education

Tags:

• The
• Bible
• Is
• True
• Proof
• Christianity
• Creation
• Stars
• Earth
• Sphere
• Job
• Hangs
• Nothing

[pestmanpat]

GREAT POINT



[digga115]

@FlatEarthers That's totally fine, don't worry about it.

As we can see, this only means that one of us is interpreting it wrong. Jesus even stated he'll come as a thief at night, which is sudden. And in the verse we were talking about, it sounds more like he takes people all at once than him taking them one, later on that day, one.

And what are the evidence for the Earth to be flat?

[FlatEarthers]

@deltaalphacharlie yep, you did... sorry for the late reply... if your curious I resonded to somebody else why.

I have 2 points for that. 1. The people of the time had spherical objects though... and 2. the design that the people had at the time for the Earth was flat. It ay just be me but I would assume a model made by the people at the time about the Bible would be more accurate than anything we could possibly think up.

[FlatEarthers]

@digga115 Sorry for taking so long to respond... occationially it takes me a while to find a suitable place to get on.

It would also logicialy be assumed that Jesus will be here for longer than 1 day... so some will work in the day, some will work at night =3

[carlswitzerfan]

Hi Shawn, Thank you for approving my video response! My brother, You are awesome!!!!

[carlswitzerfan]

Phenomenal!!

[Draslin]

@MrJakemckenna Well I know it makes the most absurdly precise predictions, and I've no doubt it's well established and tested. It still strikes me as weird though to say its MORE established and tested. It's a newer theory, with considerably fewer people qualified to speak with authority about it so in pure numbers and time it seems to me difficult to say its more certain. But I'll take your word for it. I'd still bet on Evolution, but admittedly I don't know enough about QM's history to say.

[MrJakemckenna]

@Draslin Alright, well in the scientific world, it's commonly accepted that Quantum Electrodynamics is the most established, most tested theory that we have about how the world works, whereas the exact dynamics of evolution can still be debated I think. Because it is solid mathematically, we can be certain about then, and then use them to analyse things like chemistry, which influence evolution. Physics is at the top of they pyramid of knowledge :)

[Draslin]

@MrJakemckenna Two. It's the fact that something so brittle has stood up to so much testing and new evidence that I say its as certain as anything we know. More papers may not make it more true, but our certainty that it is true increases. Perhaps it's six and one half dozen of the other, and perhaps I'm a little biased as I keep up on the ID vs Evolution crap in the US. (I live in the bible belt.) At least, Gravity, Quantum Mechanics and Evolution are on equal terms.

[Draslin]

@MrJakemckenna One. True is really just a boolean, it is or it isn't, our certainty about whether or not something is true is the variable part. You can be very precise with the predictions made by gravity or quantum mechanics, but it seems to me that there are fewer ways in which said theories can be falsified. They are pretty solid mathematically. Evolution by comparison seems to me to be incredibly brittle in a falsifiable sense, there are dozens if not hundreds of ways could it easily fail.