@Lisnageeragh Its been so long since I wrote that, I sort of forgot what I was talking about. But you certainly dont get what I was talking about either. You sort of trivialized my comment and blew it off. I'll have you know Im not your typical wetodd. Im just new to statistics, thats all. You arent getting my question, and for reasons that are probably my fault.
@CogitoErgoCogitoSum The 'normal distribution' has its own unique set of parameters and ,in fact defines what we are looking for in the first place. Given this exposition , I can see where you are coming from.
How do you generate a normal distribution in the first place for the purpose of matching it with your data? Is finding the mean and standard deviation of your data sufficient for creating an *appropriate* normal curve? I mean to say that if you were to adjust your mean and standard deviation, from what your data suggests, you may be able to optimize, so to speak, and create a more accurate normal with a lower chi-square value. Is this what we do? Is it even rational to do?
THANK YOU I understand more now then with a 3 hour lab.
Skor7567 3 days ago
lol marge orrine!!!!
getfiasco 9 months ago
thanks for upload ,its very useful
dwcreations 10 months ago
thank you!
i have a test tomorrow so at least i know something after this video!
MrGlobalthreat 11 months ago
very helpful, thanks for uploading
vefstur 11 months ago
@CogitoErgoCogitoSum Maybe come at it again. I'm not trivializing your comment or attempting to ' blow it off'.
I'm unaware of your background and was not in any referring to it. another framing of your question wouldbe interesting.
Lisnageeragh 1 year ago
@Lisnageeragh Its been so long since I wrote that, I sort of forgot what I was talking about. But you certainly dont get what I was talking about either. You sort of trivialized my comment and blew it off. I'll have you know Im not your typical wetodd. Im just new to statistics, thats all. You arent getting my question, and for reasons that are probably my fault.
CogitoErgoCogitoSum 1 year ago
@CogitoErgoCogitoSum The 'normal distribution' has its own unique set of parameters and ,in fact defines what we are looking for in the first place. Given this exposition , I can see where you are coming from.
Lisnageeragh 1 year ago
i thought Chi-Squared was a inferential statistic?
domb48 1 year ago
How do you generate a normal distribution in the first place for the purpose of matching it with your data? Is finding the mean and standard deviation of your data sufficient for creating an *appropriate* normal curve? I mean to say that if you were to adjust your mean and standard deviation, from what your data suggests, you may be able to optimize, so to speak, and create a more accurate normal with a lower chi-square value. Is this what we do? Is it even rational to do?
CogitoErgoCogitoSum 1 year ago