Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

How Valid Was The Miller-Urey Experiment? - The Atheist Experience 532

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
11,336
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 18, 2010

A caller(David) argues with Matt over abiogenesis and the Miller-Urey experiment. The caller makes the point that the amino acids formed from the experiment were inorganic, therefore can not be used as evidence of life forming from non-life. For more on the Miller-Urey experiment there are some good references on wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller-urey_experiment) Matt Dillahunty and Tracie Harris host this clip from The Atheist Experience #532 - http://www.atheist-experience.com

The Atheist Experience is produced by the Atheist Community of Austin. The ACA is a non-profit organization, promoting positive atheism and the separation of church and state. If you would like to donate please do so at http://www.atheist-community.org/donate/

To watch the latest full episodes - http://atheistexperience.blip.tv/

Show Archive Page - http://www.atheist-experience.com/archive/

  • likes, 14 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • inorganic amino acids is an oxymoron. By definition amino acids are organic molecules.

  • Lol, inorganic amino acid. They were in the shape of squares with 5 sides.

see all

All Comments (501)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Oh god this guy has no expertise in what he's talking about... He doesn't even know how to pronounce chirality or racemates. Also, they got both isomers in the experiment. We still don't know why one enantiomer was picked over another for all life. That's just what worked.

  • organic molecules are pretty much any molecules that contain carbon, thats it, carbon is abundant on the planet both in organic forms and inorganic forms. People never stop to check what organic molecules means and so become very confused. Carbon has enough stability to hold structure , every other element is too regid or too soft to hold and change structure. Thats why every lifeform is carbon based, silicon life forms are plausable but have problems and complications.

  • easily one of the most intelligent creationists ive ever heard of, Ill give him that much...

  • @xdassinx

    I hate that fucker.

  • the caller sounds like a giant dickhead.

  • @EPR89 " I could just as well say that a winged salad bowl with 31 eyes did it." BLASPHEMER! That is the FSM's greatest nemesis, the font of all evil and romain, the hidden one who clears the arteries and lowers the blood pressure, while providing all the fiber needed in a daily diet. Return to the warm bosom of marinara and meatballs (with just a touch of parmesan) and be forgiven!

  • Just me or did the caller sound like that douche bag Carl from PPSimmons?

  • Lets make this very simple and clear ... in the world of Chemistry, "organic" means "with carbon". Last time I checked, amino acids have carbon in them.

  • @SephieRothe Yes.

  • @DomeSwag so instead of being guilty of paradoxical claims they are merely guilty of equivocation.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more