@yahoovisitor Historically, disinformation was widely employed during WWII, on all levels. Indeed, supplying the German army with false intelligence data proved essential for the success of the D-Day landings. As there is a clear precedent for the use false intelligence data, I would suggest that 2001 intelligence reports of an impending terrorist attack on the USA, supplied to no-less-than 17 foreign agencies, might also have been bogus.
@yahoovisitor You've hit the nail right on the head. As the 9-11 events occurred in populated areas, the only way to jam the unwanted reports was to insert false testimony. Secondly, it was essential to confiscate all un-doctored videotape evidence from the area around the Pentagon. This means that nobody outside the affected areas can be certain as to whether they were hearing the truth, or whether they were being deceived.
@clemstevenson This is a topic which may take centuries to distinguish between right & wrong. Facts on it have so much been mixed up. You may simply watch the videos on youtube.com & decide whether it was a wise or a barbaric step.
@yahoovisitor Part two: Arguably, on September 11, 2001, the USA had the most powerful air force in the world. My question at that time was where the hell was the U.S. air force on 9-11? Through emails, in the days after 9-11, I got into angry arguments with American citizens. I told them to wake up, and they felt insulted by that. How the hell could a bunch of crazy terrorists fly sub-sonic passenger jets hundreds of miles, without a single challenge from supersonic fighters?
@yahoovisitor As I only have 500 characters per posting, I will split this post into two parts. To tell you the truth, I have never been able to function as part of a group, or club. I tend to formulate my own opinions, and/or have other interests beyond that group, or club. A similar thing happened during the days after 9-11. At that time, I had absolutely no info on any inside deception, but felt that the notion of terrorist attacks was too unbelievable for words.
@yahoovisitor No, my friend, there is no possibility that I can get dragged into any crazy scheme. I am an individual. Instead, my concern is for those who have been dis-informed/misinformed, are easily led, or even brainwashed. Some people simply want to believe that governments would tell them the truth. But even my 91-year-old mother-in-law, who was a member of the RAF's observer corps in WWII (think this is the correct title), has come to realise that governments are not trustworthy.
@clemstevenson Now that facts & figures are before you I don't think & hope that you can be misguided for any global destruction program in the days to come.
@yahoovisitor I wish that there was an amicable, simple, answer to all of the destructive negativity. But what I am seeing implies a readiness to fulfil insane prophecies that could otherwise be avoided. Right at the moment, I am receiving spam emails from a number of people with incompatible, conflicting, negative ideologies. These range from anti-Semitic hate literature, to ultra-racist KKK-style Christian fascists, to a Jewish cleric calling for the wholesale destruction of America.
@clemstevenson But my friend the stage of blaming is now over as far as I think. As every thing so far declared or made a ground for global destruction (still in process) is just as clear as the new days arising sun. Or the way we can hide our follies in night's darkness may not be so easy in the daylight. Similarly destroying natural resources on the globe in trying to enforce rule is bringing hard times.War or killing innocent persons is not the remedy to justify this destruction by any angle.
@yahoovisitor A few years back, my late brother-in-law (who died in an accident in Portugal) was assigned to a job in Moscow. He was warned not to speak English in the streets of Moscow, in case he was misidentified as being an American. If he was misidentified, he faced the possibility of being beaten up. You can't realistically expect Russians, who speak an entirely different language, to recognise the difference.
@yahoovisitor Historically, disinformation was widely employed during WWII, on all levels. Indeed, supplying the German army with false intelligence data proved essential for the success of the D-Day landings. As there is a clear precedent for the use false intelligence data, I would suggest that 2001 intelligence reports of an impending terrorist attack on the USA, supplied to no-less-than 17 foreign agencies, might also have been bogus.
clemstevenson 1 year ago
@yahoovisitor You've hit the nail right on the head. As the 9-11 events occurred in populated areas, the only way to jam the unwanted reports was to insert false testimony. Secondly, it was essential to confiscate all un-doctored videotape evidence from the area around the Pentagon. This means that nobody outside the affected areas can be certain as to whether they were hearing the truth, or whether they were being deceived.
clemstevenson 1 year ago
@clemstevenson This is a topic which may take centuries to distinguish between right & wrong. Facts on it have so much been mixed up. You may simply watch the videos on youtube.com & decide whether it was a wise or a barbaric step.
yahoovisitor 1 year ago
@yahoovisitor Part two: Arguably, on September 11, 2001, the USA had the most powerful air force in the world. My question at that time was where the hell was the U.S. air force on 9-11? Through emails, in the days after 9-11, I got into angry arguments with American citizens. I told them to wake up, and they felt insulted by that. How the hell could a bunch of crazy terrorists fly sub-sonic passenger jets hundreds of miles, without a single challenge from supersonic fighters?
clemstevenson 1 year ago
@yahoovisitor As I only have 500 characters per posting, I will split this post into two parts. To tell you the truth, I have never been able to function as part of a group, or club. I tend to formulate my own opinions, and/or have other interests beyond that group, or club. A similar thing happened during the days after 9-11. At that time, I had absolutely no info on any inside deception, but felt that the notion of terrorist attacks was too unbelievable for words.
clemstevenson 1 year ago
@yahoovisitor No, my friend, there is no possibility that I can get dragged into any crazy scheme. I am an individual. Instead, my concern is for those who have been dis-informed/misinformed, are easily led, or even brainwashed. Some people simply want to believe that governments would tell them the truth. But even my 91-year-old mother-in-law, who was a member of the RAF's observer corps in WWII (think this is the correct title), has come to realise that governments are not trustworthy.
clemstevenson 1 year ago
@clemstevenson Now that facts & figures are before you I don't think & hope that you can be misguided for any global destruction program in the days to come.
yahoovisitor 1 year ago
@yahoovisitor I wish that there was an amicable, simple, answer to all of the destructive negativity. But what I am seeing implies a readiness to fulfil insane prophecies that could otherwise be avoided. Right at the moment, I am receiving spam emails from a number of people with incompatible, conflicting, negative ideologies. These range from anti-Semitic hate literature, to ultra-racist KKK-style Christian fascists, to a Jewish cleric calling for the wholesale destruction of America.
clemstevenson 1 year ago
@clemstevenson But my friend the stage of blaming is now over as far as I think. As every thing so far declared or made a ground for global destruction (still in process) is just as clear as the new days arising sun. Or the way we can hide our follies in night's darkness may not be so easy in the daylight. Similarly destroying natural resources on the globe in trying to enforce rule is bringing hard times.War or killing innocent persons is not the remedy to justify this destruction by any angle.
yahoovisitor 1 year ago
@yahoovisitor A few years back, my late brother-in-law (who died in an accident in Portugal) was assigned to a job in Moscow. He was warned not to speak English in the streets of Moscow, in case he was misidentified as being an American. If he was misidentified, he faced the possibility of being beaten up. You can't realistically expect Russians, who speak an entirely different language, to recognise the difference.
clemstevenson 1 year ago