Chemistry. A Volatile History Episode 2 Part 5/5
Loading...
6,522
Loading...
Uploader Comments (EMC2Documentaries)
see all
All Comments (10)
-
What you have written is something to do with chemical reactivity merged with.....well i'm not sure. It would better to ask a physicist, not a chemist...or read a book or something....saying that the comment from CH3MIS7RY seems like a good place to start.....
-
@EMC2Documentaries check out a graph of binding energy per nucleon...that's a better visual explanation for the elements with Z > 92 having no stable isotopes.
-
great video thanx. using it for my science project
-
lol
-
Amazing video!!
Loading...
why is 92 elements all that it could be? i still don't understand...
hitmonlee00 5 months ago
@hitmonlee00 I believe the larger the radius of an atom becomes, the less stable it can be, the force within the atom cannot hold electrons revolving in large radius, hence it becomes unstable. That's why artificial elements beyond Uranium (e.g Einsteinium, Mendelevium, Lawrencium) hardly exist for a second
EMC2Documentaries 4 months ago
this is completely wrong, the stability of an element has nothing to do with its electrons.....
steve12345678957 1 month ago
@steve12345678957 Well, I would like to hear your correction. I was never certain about my information concerning that..
EMC2Documentaries 1 month ago