Climate Camp: Sizewell B action, 20th August 2007

Action against nuclear power.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• climate
• camp
• change
• direct
• action
• 2007
• nuclear
• power

[pegasus0]

@LukeNAESA10 1) roof panels r the lowest visual impact u can get for energy supply! the roof is still there after all + panels are just integrated to it. 2) Britain "energy need" is a bul---t figure that includes humongous waste, non-ergonomic/inefficient design of living structures despite available innovative + efficient alternatives 3) Brits (westerners) r generally way 2 spoilt and are opposing to the unavoidable necessary change in habits! 4) nuclear is a sick business! facts!

[LukeNAESA10]

@pegasus0 Let's drape every single house with ugly solar panels, which are extremely expensive, in which the owner cannot afford and/or the government will not bother to pay. Get a poor amount of voltage, especially in snowy, rainy countrys. The only thing that ever, ever requires a solar panel, is the ISS, we already have many plans for new nuclear power plants in England. We have many solar panels, most of them supply ~1% of the UK's power.

[pegasus0]

@LukeNAESA10 Thousands of panels can be applied to surfaces, such as house roofs (reduced visual impact!). + I really don't think we should have "the choice" of gambling on/harming other people's health, as we did so far with nuke accidents and non-biodegradable radioactive waste... especially having renewable alternatives! the same way murdering, burgling, rape are not a fair choice! however corporations & "spoilt", unwise westerners are winning this absurdly wrong deal!

[LukeNAESA10]

@pegasus0 I wish I knew what you just said but. I would prefer a single reactor housing rather than 1000 wind powered fans. Also Solar panels... they look every stingle/box.

[pegasus0]

@LukeNAESA10 I certainly would! However the number of solar panels and wind mills or other renewable installation would depend on the way we deal with other issues (nothing is entirely independent on earth,even issues), such as installations' efficiency (not bad so far), human population growth, energy waste, intelligent design of buildings, communities, education etc. it can all be done at the same time... all that's needed is joining forces, skills and above all 'GOOD WILL'!

[pegasus0]

Pro-nukes are a crowd of disconnected loosers! ...keep your waste levels up & justify this absurdly wrong business of nuclear! You're so meaningless!

[LukeNAESA10]

@pegasus0 Well what do you prefer? Millions of solar panels/windmills?

[pegasus0]

I guess we'll have to accept our strong disagreement that we need as much energy as the figures show today and that our ACTUAL need of artificial energy wouldn't be met by renewable energy! (hence ecovillages must be fantascience!)

[dubmywub]

@pegasus0 mate, there are no feasable alternatives and if we could generate 4000mw from a single wind farm then im sure everyone would love that. But for the time being nuclear is the only way we can generate these amounts of power.

[pegasus0]

@dubmywub ...in fact I don't support neither coal, nor nuclear, or other dirty, degrading extractive sources of energy! I am sure that before they started operating those reactors (that now resulted unsuitable to the unpredictable magnitude of the forces of nature), the people on charge for their operation felt that there would have never been the accidents that we have seen in the history of nuclear! (as you do!) I'm not going to justify more unnecessary sofference & deaths!