Explanation Of NASA's "Planet Census"

February 02, 2011 CBC News
http://MOXNews.com

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• NASA
• Releases
• Planet
• Census

[Mendelevium146]

thats why I like being canadian, we arent totally brain dead yet... A news channel in the US would show that you would have a bunch of religious right wing freaks saying its bullshit...

[ShadowSandy]

@Mendelevium146 tsk tsk... People have every right to display their stupidity for all to see, that is a fundamental freedom. Never stifle someone's ability to prove their ignorance, otherwise they might pass for smart.

[chan0chap]

what a fucking load of bullshit,

thers no telescope thats powerful enough to see any planets outside of our solar system. NOTHING has been "discovered"

[ronaldoelpaso]

@hypnofan35 This expansion of circumference much better explains the shape similarities in the earths continents, than "continental drift", and also justifies the slowing of the rotation of earth. as it expands in diameter, like a figureskater putting out their arms, it slows.. no other reason explains that..

[ronaldoelpaso]

@ronaldoelpaso And if you look at planetary expansion, it's MUCH more feasible than "continental drift". Continental drift suggests that for some reason, some unknown force has enough energy to push a continent one way or another.. Absurd... MUCH more likely that at one time the planet was solid and dense, and was "spun" into the form we see today, also justifying the perfect sphere. No small moons are round, only after a certain mass do they get nice and round. (continued)

[ronaldoelpaso]

@VsAStarr I think the reason they avoid the spot like the plague is because you could get lost there, as the edge of the hole would be so gradual, it would look very much like the horizon, till it's too late, plus you can't see the ground, at cruising altitude at the north pole. there is a permanent clod coverage. I've check satellite pics for years. Call me a nut, but when there are holes in that cloud coverage it appears to be painted over, in those holes. Check it out some time. Really weird.

[ronaldoelpaso]

@hypnofan35 I think you are right, but the best way to prove it is to just go there. If you look into air traffic contol systems, and standard flight paths, planes used to never ever go right over magnetic north, because their instruments would go wonky, which is understandable, but now they use gps systems, so there's no reason for the detour, but still now, when the fastest route from north america to Russia often cuts right through the north pole, they do a deliberate detour around it.

[VsAStarr]

Didnt they find a earth like planet a couple months ago?then it all of a sudden it goes "missing".......

[hypnofan35]

@ronaldoelpaso Maybe i forgot to mention, that there is a simplistic measurment that would "show" that the Earth is hollow. There should be a measurable amount of Gforce diminution as one moves downward from the outer and inner surfaces. It would also be a good measure of total distance to the gravity directional change zone or zero Gforce point. i can't say how far, but that would probably do the job for estimating. Some manner of sensitive spring Gforce detector.

[ronaldoelpaso]

@hypnofan35 @ronaldoelpaso Scientists assume that none of these factors have changed. It soon becomes apparent that if one thing changed, the whole timesline they so proudly teach would crumble. How could the brontosaurus breathe out of nostrils the same size as a horse, when it weighed 80 times as much? There are clues suggesting atmospheric pressure and oxygen content were VERY different. Consider insect size. They are limited in size by food and oxygen. Dragonflies were a foot long..

[ronaldoelpaso]

@hypnofan35 Agreed

[ronaldoelpaso]

@hypnofan35 And they never discuss the differences to the decay curve, due to atmospheric pressure, changes in ambient radiations, including thermal temp changes, reflective/insulative values of surrounding material, ie. rock, soil. These changes are most effected in the end of the curve, where you approach zero, NOT at the beginning of the curve. Picture this this as a worn bearing on a car, that's rolling down the hill. As it approaches level, the friction becomes exponentially more apparent.