X-38 CRV Crew Return Vehicle re-entry

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
23,066
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 13, 2006

Here is a concept video of the now cancelled X-38 CRV. This was to be the lifeboat for the ISS. This was recycled for a possible CEV design, but the capsule was selected.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (sixpackgenius)

  • Cant it land without the parachute?

  • It does need the parachute to slow it down, it has skids not landing gear. Basically it is like a capsule.

  • Cool Video! I was hoping they would have used this design as it's a direct decedent of the old USAF Dyna-Soar project from the late 50's . Great work what software did you use?

  • I had this video from the now defunct X-38 website. I did not make it. It is my opinion that it was wrong to cancel this program. We really need an additional lifeboat for the ISS besides the Soyuz.

Top Comments

  • Would this actually work?

  • Yup, It would.

see all

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Such a futurist machine and all, and then it needs an archaic parachute...

  • The reason the Parachute was needed is that lifting bodies generally have a pretty high stall speed. This way, you could land at a lower speed which would be safer, less stressful to the astronauts, and less damaging to the spacecraft since it doesn't use landing gear or skids.

  • Dear All,

    I have some question about psychology:

    (1) Why do we love aspace travel?

    (2) Why do we enjoy to design and to build new space craft?

    (3) Why do we like to be "space tourist" for space holiday?

    (4) What will be the most desirable design space craft in the coming future that will fit our life-style?

    THANK YOU IN ADVANCE for your creative ideas and brainstorm!!! :)

  • @flamesholder Thank you for the quality information.

  • @jerryaltman Well, it's not a parachute, it's a parafoil - an airfoil inflated by ram pressure, so it's rather a wing, than a parachute.

    I think, that the X-32 could land without it, but the landing speed would be perhaps in order of 200 knots (I do not know the exact number, this is just my guess from the shape and weight)

    That kind of lading speed is unacceptable if you do not have pilots on board. The scenario for X-38 assumed that the occupants could be injured or otherwise incapacitated.

  • The best X-38 documentaryfilm, not animation

    watch?v=b2lpYyAAG8E&NR=1

    -A 6min 49sek film on construction(what, where)

    - astronauttraining in the womitcomet for the X-38

    - droptesting from B-52

    - flight, parachutelaunchsequense and landing.

    -narreted by techpersonell

    Enjoy (Norway, Oct 8, 09)

  • well,space shuttle uses wings for gliding and for

    landing

  • in the mind of an american, hahaha

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more