Newt Gingrich Caught in a Lie?

Jan 24, 2012 - Lew Rockwell discusses Newt Gingrich's lie about supporting Barry Goldwater when he really worked for Nelson Rockefeller, Gingrich's declaration that conservatives must support FDR and why Gingrich has got the 'crazy bug'

http://RonPaul2012.com/

Ron Paul Video Playlist
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=257C3E2F32D6EA89

FAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
judge napolitano, freedom watch, gingrich, lew rockwell,

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• judge napolitano
• freedom watch
• gingrich
• lew rockwell

[CalZukiWorks]

"Truth is treason in the empire of lies"-Ron Paul

[flipverb]

"unthinking types" hahaha. I'm gonna have to borrow that one.

[joepeeler34]

@fascistcat See you on the moon with Newt on your lunar mining expedition. What quadrant will you be staying in? Watch out though--I hear there are lunar jihadists up there. Given that you and Newt are going, there may not be any lunar jihadists for long, but there will be two Lunartics. Newt can teach you some new adverbs. Have fun!

[joepeeler34]

@fascistcat What unconstitutional government departments has Newt or Romney proposed eliminating? LOL! That's your revolution?

Why hasn't Newt called for a free market in money, banking, and interest rates? Why does he think the Federal Reserve can plan these things?

And to resort to the anti-semitic charge is laughable. Arabs and Palestinians are semites. Since you want to kill them off for standing up to their U.S. govt. puppet states, I charge you as the anti-semite :)

[joepeeler34]

@fascistcat Oh, it knows how to play the jew card. It's what big government neo-cons resort to whenever they can't defend their phony conservative positions or progressive candidates. It's laughable. Look out! Is that a jihadist under your bed?

Newt loves corporatism,not free markets.

Newt was in favor of health mandates and slews of others...before running in GOP primary. Supported ethanol subsidies and many others.

Proposes no real trillion dollar cuts.

[joepeeler34]

@fascistcat I am "historically" wrong. LOL! You take after Gingrich in your love of words that end in "ly." I suspect that I am "fundamentally" wrong as well. "Frankly," you are wrong :)

Gingrich was abandoned by rank and file because he was erratic and untrustworthy. He didn't have the votes and he knew it. He then resorted to claiming that he "decided not to run for the good of the party." He didn't have the votes and spun it the best way that snake knows how.

[fascistcat]

@joepeeler34 You have been historically wrong on each and every charge you made, and I have a puppy that needs some playtime.

You are unpersuadable as to actual empirical fact. Your position is entirely unsupportable. I know, I know - I must be some Jew or Jew-lover.

Have fun at the G-8 in Chicago. Gotta go.

[fascistcat]

@joepeeler34 Gingrich asked the Republicans to vote against him in that 84th frivolous ethics charge. He had to provide lawyers to defend himself and The Office of The Speaker each and every time. He told the reluctant Republicans that the Democrats wouldn't stop until "..they had their pound of flesh."

Speaker Jim Wright resigned before The House voted to expel him. A so-called 'book' with as little as one word per page bought in bulk by supporters -money laundering.

[joepeeler34]

@fascistcat I'd like to throw Newt under the bus. I'd make sure to back up over that pretend conservative while I was at it.

Do you still not understand the difference between the discovery process of a free makret and the central planning that occurs in a progressive corporatist scheme? One is central planning. In the other a profit/loss system and consumer preference guides it.

Why doesn't Newt propose real cuts in the trillions? Why no call for ending unconstitutional govt. dept'.s?

[joepeeler34]

@fascistcat Your comment made no sense. I ask when do Presidents ever pick up seats in off year elections? It's not common. I don't know why you hate Clinton so much. He and Gingrich just played off each other. They are ideological peas in a pod.

Newt thinks he is "the definer of civilization." He thinks he can centrally plan society and the economy to good effect. That is a progressive conceit.

He even confuses public-private partnerships with free markets. He's a conman.

[joepeeler34]

@fascistcat Newt through real conservatives under the bus. He's always been a Rockefeller Republican. He's also the only House Speaker to ever be convicted of ethics violations. I'm sure that was all made up according to apologists for big govt. Newt.

Newt is a not a free market man. He isn't free market on money (likes statist paper currency), interest rates, and banking (likes the Federal Reserve banking cartel system).

Newt is a nationalist, not a federalist. He's a fraud.

[fascistcat]

@joepeeler34 <"When do sitting presidents ever pick up House and Senate seats in off year elections?" Evidently, after they get their asses handed to them in a prior historic election. Clinton had a net loss of 56 House seats through his cycles('92 -9, '94 - 54, '96 +3, '98 +4).

Myth: Republicans were punished for impeachment. The reality is they grew tired of negative press and thought if they threw Newt under the bus, they'd be left alone. Revolution is hard, it seems.