9/11 South Tower Strike - Plane Size, Shape, And Frame Rate Change Behind Crane

It does not matter what anybody might believe or the story is, the plane in this video clearly looks altered. The laws of motion state the building hit the plane with the exact same kinesmatic force the plane hit the building with. The problem is the building is constructed much stronger and is made of denser, stronger, and heavier materials. It is literally impossible that the plane did more damage to the building, than it recieved from the building in the collision. Notice the detachable wings and tail do not shear off, and the plane does not experience resistance until it explodes inside and out the other side of the building. The plane flys right in like butter and stops within 200 feet. The black boxes and airplanes themselves disappeared into thin air. The debris that exits the building is white hot and on fire, but the landing gear and engine were never white hot or on fire where they landed. The object that exited the building did not tumble, and it momentarily gained velocity after exiting the building, as seen in many impact videos. The eyewitness accounts at the moment on 9/11 have great variation and are hardly reliable when they conflict with classical mechanics. Harley guy or Isaac Newton?

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• NIST
• FOIA
• FBI
• September
• 11
• 2001
• 911
• Flight
• 77
• Pentagon
• NYPD
• Port
• Authority
• Bush
• Cheney
• Clinton
• Al
• Qaeda
• Bin
• Laden
• Obama
• Pakistan
• CIA
• DOJ
• False
• Flag
• Coverup
• Commission
• Pennsylvania
• Staged
• Israel
• Taliban
• Terror
• terrorism
• Iraq
• Afghanistan
• NTSB
• British
• Construction
• Damage
• Plane
• Missile
• Demolition
• 757
• 767
• airplane
• Explosion
• Thermate
• Implosion
• Eyewitness
• Thermite
• Investigation
• Science
• Physics
• Newton
• Galileo
• Engineering

[ghana25]

Were they trying to cover-ip the Nose out shot? LOL

It's getting more hilarious day by day.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@surfjerr @IWOP1 Chill out, guys, you both are on the same side. It seems as if there is some confusion here ..... you both are well informed on 9/11 and esentially believe the same thing. Peace, friends.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@left4deadfan174 Thats funny, it did not even crash in the field you claim they recovered it from. You need to stop doing drugs, they are making you dumb.

[mikebeange]

It’s funny that people will use personal testimony from people who heard explosions to support the claim that the buildings where dropped with pre placed explosives (which I agree with) but they say that the testimonies of people who saw a plane hitting the building are not valid & they all must be secret agents & all the videos MUST be faked...

[lovatojonasfan1]

Its the cables smart one....

[jeffleiken100]

its not nose it is actually a rocket at the belly of the plan

[zenoist2]

I dont know if youre aware of it but photographers do spend a lot of time exploring possibilities an picking the best viewpoint.

They certainly wouldnt pick a spot with a tree waving in front of them.

when they can move 1 step to the left or right/

The video is fake.

[zenoist2]

Im a photgrapher in my spare time so this is odd.

Pick the crappest view imaginabible and dont worry about a tree. Dont bother to step either left or right to get a much better view.

i think its false and the trees added. Nobody sane would have the crap viewpiont here.