Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Jack Ruby - Part 2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
73,179
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 27, 2007

More newsclips.

Outtake with DA Henry Wade. **Personally I do not see a truthful man here. He knew Ruby, and you can see it is evident IMO.

Some statements by Ruby himself. He talks in riddles mostly. He claimes a conspiracy against his person.

Mark Lane discloses evidence stating that Ruby was an informant and was indeed working for Richard Nixon.

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Jack Ruby basically says at the end that LBJ was complicit in the assassination. The conspirators threatened to wipe out Ruby's family if he didn't kill Oswald and if he ever told what he knew. This was a massive conspiracy that people claimed could not have taken place because "someone would've talked." Well, someone did. His name was Jack Ruby.

  • this stinks completely,

    anyone who still believes jfk was killed by just one lone gunman ,...have lost a part of his brain

see all

All Comments (200)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • if you're into this conspiracy look up Carlos Marcello, especially a book called "Mafia Kingfish" it links just about everybody involved it, great read. it does mention that Marcello gave money to LBJ to keep Texas authorities off of his back.

  • What did the WC "prove" regarding only 3 shots being fired? Their selected witnesses stated there were 3 but what about all the others who stated there were more than 3? Just because the WC predetermined there were only 3 shots and took testimony supporting that theory doesn't mean the proved anything. What did the WC "prove" about the Z film? Nothing. They developed a theory. Just because their theory was the first doesn't mean they proved what it shows? ALL differing statements were mistaken?

  • @EdMahoney19 alright but what would be the point of them doing so?

  • @LiftAngry "The grassy knoll is out of the question for anything but a head shot". Nonsense. Any visible portion of JFK, including his upper torso, could be shot.

    There are several witnesses on record saying the driver DID shoot his gun. Don't you think it is strange that the CIA sponsored lie called "sun glare" is only visible when Greer is shooting his nickel platted .45.

  • @jjh36Is how so?

  • @LiftAngry Fool.

  • Is there a picture of Ruby with Nixon in 1947?

  • @10Faenor thats where your single bullet comes into play to create 7 wounds. The grassy knoll is out of the question for anything lower than the head shot. the shooters would have to be elevated for for those wounds to hit connally and amazingly all the wounds go at a downward angle. how do you shoot someone in the thigh in a car without being elevated. and if the throat shot was a frontal shot coming from the knoll, the exit wound would come out kennedys left upper back.

  • @squirevet

    Well you have to admit he didn't speak very clearly, did he?

  • @LiftAngry There were several documented missed shots. So there were more than 4 shots. As SS agent Roy Kellerman said on his WC testimony: "I am going to say that I have, from the firecracker report and the two other shots that I know, those were three shots. But, Mr. Specter, if President Kennedy had from all reports four wounds, Governor Connolly three, there have got to be more than three shots, gentlemen".

    "I am going to say..." the official story line.

    "But,...." he knows it is a lie.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more