YouTube home Comedy Week on YouTube
Upload

Will Taxing the Rich Fix the Deficit?

LearnLiberty LearnLiberty·234 videos
55,050
204,484
Like     Dislike 267

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like LearnLiberty's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike LearnLiberty's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add LearnLiberty's video to your playlist.

Published on Jul 2, 2012

The government's budget deficit in 2009 was $1.5 trillion. Many have suggested raising taxes on the rich to cover the difference between what the government collected in revenue and what it spent. Is that a realistic solution? Economics professor Antony Davies uses data to demonstrate why taxing the rich will not be sufficient to make the budget deficit disappear. He says, "The budget deficit is so large that there simply aren't enough rich people to tax to raise enough to balance the budget." Instead, it's time to work on legitimate solutions, like cutting spending.

Source data: http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/file...

Find LearnLiberty on...
Twitter: http://bit.ly/RBl3Wv
Facebook: http://on.fb.me/WziHpR
Our Website: http://bit.ly/RBl3FH

  • Category

  • License

    Standard YouTube License

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Top Comments

  • Bruce Wayne

    "It does not matter how good your theory sounds, it does not matter how elegant it is, if it doesn't agree with experiment-- its wrong" Richard Feynman.

    Now I dont care how bad you think it is, but it worked everywhere it was implemented. Look at the purchasing power parity of someone from singapore and compare it to keynes paradise france, hint-the country with more skyscrapers has double the one with a shitty tower.

    · 9

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Bruce Wayne's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Bruce Wayne's comment.
    in reply to trygvb (Show the comment)
  • Jordan Rusche

    Here's something to consider...without the investors' money, many of the employees wouldn't have a job with that company. Investors allow companies to grow at a faster rate (i.e. hire more employees). High taxes slows down the rate of a company's growth and slows down the growth of jobs in the process. With that said, if your empathies lie with the employees, I think it is best to support low corporate and investment taxes because it will result it more jobs available.

    · 6

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Jordan Rusche's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Jordan Rusche's comment.
    in reply to Jonathan Doolin (Show the comment)

All Comments (2,124)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • Gavin Harrison

    A bit disingenuous, considering it ignores corporate, capital gains, and dividends taxes. Dividends are taxed at only 15% no mater what level if total income the owner has and is not subject to social security tax, compared toa national tax rate of 25% paid by people making more than 36k/year or more

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Gavin Harrison's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Gavin Harrison's comment.
  • player276

    Wouldnt that be nice? You sit on the couch doing nothing while those who worked theis asses off have to keep working their asses off so you can do thing. Seams legit.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate player276's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate player276's comment.
    in reply to GrungeyDude (Show the comment)
  • Antony Davies

    You are incorrect.

    The CBO data quoted in the video is here: w w w . cbo . gov / sites / default / files / cbofiles / attachments / Tax_liability_Shares . pdf

    · 2

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Antony Davies's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Antony Davies's comment.
    in reply to GrungeyDude (Show the comment)
  • garthbartin

    Any discussion of tax rates by income level that measure by total income rather than disposable income is laughable and misleading. Any fair and intelligent tax statistic should account for cost of living.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate garthbartin's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate garthbartin's comment.
  • Raattis

    29 * 1.5 = 43,5

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Raattis's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Raattis's comment.
    in reply to Coerciveutopian (Show the comment)
  • Ken Smith

    The R & R spreadsheet was not actually where the "errors" were. The spreadsheet was used as the front end for some software. The "errors" were in that software. The thing that I found the most interesting in it was the reason I placed quotes around the word "errors". We need honest data and honest math to do evidence based policies.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Ken Smith's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Ken Smith's comment.
    in reply to GrungeyDude (Show the comment)
  • mmann66666

    I think they are missing the point of:

    per que no los dos

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mmann66666's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mmann66666's comment.
  • Coerciveutopian

    29*2!=44

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Coerciveutopian's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Coerciveutopian's comment.
  • GrungeyDude

    And this completely stupid suggestion to cut spending to fix the deficit has already been proven false. Reinhart and Rogoff's Austerity economics were based on a spreadsheet error, so how about however made this video stops spreading idiocy so we can talk about real solutions like taxing the rich, closing loopholes, regulating banks, and using deficit spending to get us out of this mess like we did in the Great Depression. It worked once, why wouldn't it work again?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate GrungeyDude's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate GrungeyDude's comment.
  • GrungeyDude

    This video is completely skating around facts to help support its point. The taxes on the richest Americans are nowhere near 29% because of capital gains, corporate tax loopholes, and income tax deductions. The top 0.1% saved about 150,000 dollars a year each from the Bush Tax Cuts, nowhere near as much as anyone else. If the that income tax rate, capital gains tax rate, and corporate tax rate were raised to even 50%, and loopholes were closed the rich would bring us right out of this crash.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate GrungeyDude's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate GrungeyDude's comment.
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later