Transitional Fossils

I show of an array of transitional fossils.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• transitional
• fossils
• intermediate
• forms
• evolution

[Curi0uss0uL]

right so what do you think that means?? apparently two human genomes would also differ alot so what is the point??

[Kabane52]

Two human genomes differ VERY little. A neanderthal genome and a human genome would differ a lot more.

[gregrutz]

@pppaaaooo13 That is because you are stupid and uneducated. If you know why these fossils were important you would know they were transitional fossils. You don't even know what a transitional fissils is.

[gregrutz]

6 IDiots don't like the fact that there are transitional fossils.

[glendaweil]

Like I said no transitional fossils.

[pppaaaooo13]

I didnt understand a shit.Why these are transitional fossils?

[raztis1]

@ricaleigh007 you and your family will serve a fake fairytale monster... ok.. i guess if you enjoy wasting your time, thats cool, just keep it out of our schools and govt.

[patrickledford420]

@ricaleigh007 yeh, just like serving the "lord" was what the person who classified us as apes was doing, since he was a theist creationist. why does admitting that we are apes (look up the definition of ape) and that the evidence for evolution is beyond reasonable doubt? if you want to learn more about evolution, please, personal message me

[ricaleigh007]

YOU are, as for me and my household we shall serve the Lord.

[patrickledford420]

@ricaleigh007 we ARE apes

[patrickledford420]

@Curi0uss0uL if you go into this thinking "nope, there just frauds" then you admit willful ignorance. neaderthal is not human, its DNA was sampled and it was not homo sapien

[Phyerbyrd]

Why do you automatically assume life needs a designer? Most complex structures are created through trial and error processes, with less efficient variants being discarded and more complex ones being worked off of. Bio-molecules are capable of creating things without intelligence, producing variation without intelligence and selecting for more efficient shapes without intelligence. All real intelligence does is speed things up.

[Phyerbyrd]

intelligence is defined as taking in information from your environment, processing it and reacting to it accordingly. Reactive properties are something materials possess, meaning if god is intelligent he must also be material. Material objects cannot form into complex shapes spontaneously, meaning he must have either gradually formed without intelligent intervention or have been created himself. But that just leads to the question of where his creator came from or how he formed on his own.

[apeek7]

I have news for you... EVERY FOSSIL IS A TRANSITIONAL FOSSIL

[artyfarty2]

"DNA is more proof of God than any ..."

LOL

How is DNA proof of a god?

[artyfarty2]

"And the base assertion that DNA is proof that everything is related"

DNA is not proof, but contains the proof. There are things called markers in DNA. Things that have no function which appear in related species. They are caused by copying mistakes and viruses and get passed on through each generation and as species diverge the emergent species still contain the evidence. That is where the proof is.

[artyfarty2]

" How did DNA evolve?"

It doesn't matter. That fact is that DNA does evolve is what is important in the theory of evolution. But for your information DNA evolved from RNA. What did RNA evolve from? earlier simpler versions.

[Gplex]

Are you saying humans are not apes? Next thing you know you wont want humans to be called mammals, vertebrates, Multicellular organism etc etc.. your argument that you have read from a creationist website has already been refuted over and over.

[ricaleigh007]

Yeah sure when I'm talking to a bunch of apes?

[ricaleigh007]

DNA is more proof of God than any pseudoscientific theory that still swings in the breeze waiting for the real evidence. It shows the design in humanity, and that there was obviously a designer, to someone who's not terrified of that concept to the point of constructing walls of denial and pseudoscience in its place.

[ricaleigh007]

That's what I thought. You make a bold assertion and then when I ask you to elaborate you tell me to read a book and add ad hominem because that's all you've got. If it weren't for ad hominem evlutionists couldn't come with anything but the mantra: it IS a fact, it IS a fact. But ask them to back up any of the bold assertions and they get weal mad. If there were truth behind the assertions the facts would be there to backup the claims. It seems that your theory just dissolves into thin air.

[Gplex]

Do you have any idea how stupid you sound?

[Gplex]

These no way I can educate you in 500 characters, you basically claiming that dna is a fantasy because you dont understand it. Now thats pretty stupid..

Anyone go read a book, and think about this, if dna doesnt change, then why is it that your dna isnt the same as your parents, you sister, your bother...

[ricaleigh007]

DNA can be trusted, it's the liars that put words in its and everybody's mouth that can't be trusted. How did DNA evolve? And the base assertion that DNA is proof that everything is related, what makes you think that fantasy is true?

[ricaleigh007]

Everything relates us to animals, and anything that looks alike must have evolved one into the other, and every fossil is a transitional; is there anything that you don't see as proof of evolution? Dogma has bewildered your wits.

[Gplex]

We are apes, we are also mammals and vertebrates, are you going to complain about those as well because the also relate us to animals.