A look at some facts regarding the geological samples returned from the Moon.
For more on Big Muley:
http://curator.jsc.nasa.gov/lunar/lsc/61016.pdf
Phil Webb produced an incredibly detailed and researched series debunking many of the current moon hoax theories. The series includes an extensive study of the geologic samples returned by the Apollo astronauts.
Regardless of where you stand in the moon hoax debate, you'll learn a lot from Phil's series. Check it out:
http://www.youtube.com/user/philwebb59#grid/user/6E14DF880C26441F
*Originally released by Kalel Jordan Kent on November 28, 2009, this video was an innocent casualty in the White Jarrah Copyright Attacks. This film in no way was an attack on his particular tin foil collection.*
@ProppaGannis Thanks for confirming everyone's suspicion that you're just an ignorant cowardly troll who can't even due basic math and/or research.
ProppaGannis 6 months ago
@ProppaGannis You again?
I won't bother with the math because they never got mule from the moon.
EGMAG 6 months ago
@EGMAG Are you scared to show everyone you can't do math? Check your comment. Your fear caused you to miss some letters and punctuation in your 2nd sentence. Let's try to (again) make it easier for you.
How large a robot would you need to pick up a 25lb football shaped rock here on Earth? No mention of the moon or Muley. C'mon, show us you're not a clueless troll. Show us you're not all talk and insults. Show everyone at "this forum" that you're smarter than me.
ProppaGannis 6 months ago
@ProppaGannis cowardly way <,
I suggest you look at your coward face in the mirror and stop crapping in your own pants in this forum, your really beginning to smell. There was is and will not be a big collection robot for the alleged muley lie or whatever else rocks except the ones in your head. Next question or go clean your dirty underwear right now!
EGMAG 6 months ago
@EGMAG Such a cowardly way to back out of answering a direct question. Notice I mentioned nothing about going to the moon and collecting a rock the size of Muley. So far I've asked two questions and you couldn't answer either one. I'll make it easier for you. Consider another rock identical to Muley from here on Earth. How large would the collection robot need to be? The bonus still stands. Take your time thinking of a way to dodge the question again.
ProppaGannis 6 months ago
@ProppaGannis ok, Here's your question: <<
ok, Here's your answer:
Muley was not collected on the moon at all.
EGMAG 6 months ago
@EGMAG ok, Here's your question:
Considering Lunar Sample 61016 (Big Muely, featured in this video): If that rock was collected by robotic means, How large would the sample return robot need to be?
Bonus: Show us just one example of a similar working sample return robot with similar capabilities.
You're on the clock. Good luck.
ProppaGannis 6 months ago
@EGMAG ok, I'll be more specific and choose more distinct words. You're right there was no debating. But there has been an exchange of words and you clearly have come out of it looking like you lost or are lost. It's funny that you would accuse someone else of blathering when you haven't offered anything but senseless rambling. But if you want a question moon related, I'll accommodate. But we're going to stick to the topic of this video. So put your thinking cap on and answer the following:*cont
ProppaGannis 6 months ago
@ProppaGannis debate <<
completely off topic; No debating. Just get onto your moonwalk topics and start with one (1), only ONE question or statement at a time. Stop blathering please.
EGMAG 6 months ago
@EGMAG It was a simple "yes or no" question. And you replied: " I thought maybe finding your sense of humor might bust your stubborn fantasy bubble. Oh well guess not." How is that answering the question?! It's not. Just more trolling.You've lost the debate but your fevered ego desperately needs the last word. So take it. And make sure to be extra trolly.
ProppaGannis 6 months ago