GUNZE pantyhose commercial ②
Top Comments
All Comments (8)
-
nice.
-
From a woman's viewpoint and experience, I can tell you that pantyhose serve both aesthetic and practical purposes. Bare feet against shoe leather are highly uncomfortable, blister easily, and sweat profusely. That kind of foot odor is not sweet, just rancid. Pantyhose, definitely.
-
Namely Stacy London!! What a self-centered beeotch!! Just watch her Dr. Scholls commercial & you'll see what I mean. My old fashioned mother likes WNTW & I cringe when she watches it when I'm at my parents home. I don't even find Stacy L. attractive one bit. I think her personality & overbearing love for posh Manhattan says it all. I think SL was definitely behind those expensive outfits that Sarah Palin wore during the 2008 presidential campaign. She's obviously a Palin fan.
-
all the feminist driven women pretty much put it in the modern day woman's subconscious that pantyhose are a shackle to the man's world.
so dont blame the actual women because women fallow what mags and "what not to wear" tells them. blame the feminists who start it.
-
hey bucky im with you there bare legs do suck ladies put them pantyhose on please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
WTF?!
TG4 YouTube. Thats the most pulling on hose Ive seen in an ad in a long long time. Short hose ad but at least Asian countries like China & Japan have the right idea. Whered all the pantyhose commercials go here in the USA? Hope this hose angst stops very soon & these ads are aired again soon. Bare legs suck!!
bucky468 3 years ago 11
Wouldn't surprise me 1 bit if Palin hires London to be a part of her administration if she wins the presidency in 2012. London's position - secretary of fashion or style (lol)!!!! It'll be a sad day if that ever happens. Keep Stacy London or any other feminists out of politics - period!!!
bucky468 2 years ago