235 Batman Arkham City, ripping off gamers since 2011

The title says it all.
Feel free to add me on facebook! http://www.facebook.com/emyouzz
and while you're there, Like L1 Games:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/L1-Games/120414194639833

Sorry about the quality on this video. had some problems. I'm not 100% pleased with it, but I wanted to get it out there for you guys. So here it is:)

Category:

Gaming

Tags:

• batman
• arkham
• city
• exclusive
• online
• pass
• catwoman
• ripoff
• rip
• off
• warner
• bros.
• extortion
• ps3
• 360
• playstation
• xbox
• l1games
• level
• one
• games
• l1
• gamer
• muzz
• gamermuzz

[tonywonyx]

You say this because your a video game re-seller and it affects your business.

[L1Games]

@tonywonyx

Yeah, you need to rethink that failed logic. I say it because I'm a gamer and it hurts everybody.

Fact is, the online pass doesn't hurt me as a retailer. I give less for the games it affects and sell them for less. My profit margin is the same regardless. the one who gets hurt is the gamer who pays full price for the new game and then gets less when they want to trade/sell it because it's resale value is crushed by the online pass.

[HospitalWaste]

everyone already know that they are doing this. Every company always does this... Nothing in todays world means anything anymore. Everything is about money in this entire world for every industry. its supply and demand... they found out that video games have become more popular and more popular and they decided to fill their wallets. They know they could raise the price for a new game from 59 bucks to 109 bucks and wed still pay it. It is bullshit but it is life man life in the 21st century

[L1Games]

@HospitalWaste

yeah, and if you want to lie down and take it, that's cool. go ahead. Personally, as long as I have a voice, I'll speak up and hopefully more gamers will listen. Whether I can change things or not. at least I'm not going to be their bitch.

[itsteatime1]

Your audio sounds weird and kind of doesn't match your mouth.

[L1Games]

@itsteatime1

I agree, had problems with this one. not sure why:(

[L1Games]

@SoulBrothaNumbuh2 I'm inclined to agree. the popularization of video games combined with internet service/connectivity was a recipe for disaster and it's playing out like a worst case scenario.

[mattiatorX]

I think Nintendo's got it right. The following quote essentially sums it up:

"Yes, look how far behind Nintendo is: Games still come with all their content available to the players used or brand new, online doesn't require $10+ fees, and there's no DRM punishing the paying customers as much as the criminals."

[seanbhoy192]

I bought the game on launch day and i was pissed off about the catwoman part and the robin dlc were put into a code for xbox live as i didn't have my internet active at the time, therefore i didn't have xbox live. Then i played the game and forgot all about the catwoman and Robin dlc because it was that good and i completed it in one day. There then came a point that i really wanted to play as catwoman and maybe a bit of Robin. I now have Xbox live and am enjoying the game even more.

[kipperthefrog3]

bad news: ubisoft, Warner Brothers and other companies are utilizing online pass crap. I'm not buying "Kingdoms of Alamar" because of Online Pass.

[MrSugarholic123]

this is the second video i watched (1st: 230, I hate whats happening! MW3 Elite, Season Ticket, ETC.) and i like your vids and i 60% agree hope that makes you happy.

[UchihaGamer111]

@L1Games Can you please explain how the blatant digital recharging of products or in actuality rights which are already payed for, then sold over to? Can the movie industry start charging my friends a online pass to watch movies in the future because I only purchase "rights". This is BS, and I have stopped buying games completely, sorry won't hurt no one, only have Wal-Mart and Gamestop they shut down the small town game stores. One of my favorite was Phat Boy Games who had imports.

[UchihaGamer111]

@L1Games Not only that cutting online to me was, but cutting single player content is definitely recharging somebody for second hand purchase. That is my problem, that can't be legal, to recharge some one for a second hand purchase. When some one buys new, they buy the rights to the disk and all content on it. If they sell it used for what ever price they can the person buys it, hell Suikoden 2 goes for 60 dollars still. The purchaser pays for all of the previous owners rights.

[UchihaGamer111]

Its like i've been saying this needs to be taken to court, has it not been done yet? How can they recharge somebody for making a second hand purchase? When you buy the game you buy the rights to the game, when you sell the game to ANYONE, WHETHER STORE OR FAMILY,FRIEND,STRANGER, you're selling the RIGHTS you purchased to the game. When an online player is lost from selling the game, and replaced by a new one no server space is taken up but merely replaced. How can this be legal?

[HospitalWaste]

@L1Games you got me a little wrong there bud i agree with you 100% and think you have perfect points. I myself dont buy dlc except in specific situations such as fallout and bioshock (the 2 best games ever) but the way i see it is even if its wrong the companies will never stop. Its all about the almighty dollar to them if anyone thinks they care about us they are 1000% wrong. Money dictates everything and there will always be the people who will support their exploiting us. not me!