The Bones of the Apostle Paul--Found?

The Catholic Church announced that the bones of the Apostle Paul were found in Rome. Der Stern wrote that there is NO EVIDENCE that these were the bones of the Apostle Paul. Die Welt added that there can be no certainty that the bones are those of the Apostle Paul, and that experts DOUBT the accuracy of the Pope's claim. Zenit admitted that over the centuries the original tomb of Paul "disappeared from view and eventually could no longer be identified." Why is this? Could it be that the remains of Paul are not to be found in Rome?

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• bones
• Paul
• Rome
• Bede
• Vitalian
• Canterbury

[somefuture]

Thanks for the correction. Another misleading statement of the Pope. How would he know that these bones belong to the Apostle Paul.

[pmarceau]

I found Vatic means prophet, oracle or seer.

It was a "word of the day" from Merriam Webster.

Not sure how the "an" added alters the meaning.

Is the Vatican the "False Prophet"?

I think so.

[dgraebner1]

The correct answer to the question posed about "Why paul's tomb was lost" of course "because it is extremely difficult to keep track of the precise location of a sarcophagus in a building given 2,000 years of rebuilding, remodeling, fires, sacking armies, etc.". In fact, this tomb's location was actually better-known than many other graves of great antiquity, and the sarcophagus was hidden mainly because of renovations and the debris of a famous 1823 fire that destroyed most of the church.

[boblackey1]

@LIVERLADD Why is the man fussing so? The quote from the Pope he read says, if you listen carefully, seemed to be Paul. And of course there is no scientifice proof for Paul. Those bones could belong to another man. But clearly a man who died in the 1st or 2nd century. Also if Paul was moved from Rome to England, could it be that Paul was moved to the place the Pope thinks is St. Paul? No of these questions can be answered. The Pope can't be sure or this man here can't be sure it is NOT Paul.

[LIVERLADD]

It doesn`t matter Paul was just a man special but just a man

[EducatedRebellion101]

Rome is deceiver of all.

[mbeangarrett]

Thank you for clearing this up. We must all stay on our toes to be aware of all of these deceptions,

[jonjonloulou]

Thanks so much for your extensive research on this "fabricated " bones tale. Historical facts do not lie, Not to mention the fact that bones are just that....BONES!! Men's bodies will return to the earth, but God promises eternal life to those that obey him and live according to God's commandments and not the fables of men!! It's all vanity,  this is just another falsified media stunt from the Catholic church. More to come.....stand watch!!!

[bigbono12]

In the First Coming or Incarnation God came as a child and grew to manhood among men. In the Second Coming God will return as a fully mature human form - GOD, and not some ambiguous form of God the Father coming out of the clouds in the sky. The sky and cloud metaphor is a Biblical metaphor signifying CHRIST coming/ or will come from a higher plane of existence.

[bigbono12]

If you think about it, if thesecond coming is only a few short years away and if Christ wll appear in glory as a mature human, and since God will not and cannot create Him out of the thin air He must be alreay here.

[bigbono12]

The fact that Christ will appear in glory and majesty at the second coming is an undisputed fact of scripture and scriptural prophesy. That Christ also said many false prophets will come speaking in my name is also scriptural truth. When I said in a previous post that Christ is already walking the earth ( in a hidden form) is also a truth from my own personal experience, which does not negate the fact that the second coming will be glorious and majestic. The two are not mutually exclusive.

[jamesgoya]

We know who's world it is TODAY! Satan's!! Your timely pro-active studies, on so many current topics, that impact each of usl are Greatly appreciated. Continued blessings to you and Standingwatch.