Eyewitness Accounts of WTC Explosions on 911 (Part Two)

These are actual eyewitness accounts of demolition explosives.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 911
• wtc
• trade
• explosions
• witness
• accounts
• north
• south
• tower
• conspiracy

[muzicmaker2001]

@roquefortfiles

Actually, "that chicks" name is Edna Cintron. A photo showing her standing at the impact hole is also included in NIST NCSTAR 1, WTC Investigation, page 117 (167), Figue 6-26, (a) Observed Damage. Did NIST fake this photo? And she was not the only person seen at the impact hole. Desperation is always entertaining..

watch?v=3151MqXu52s

[muzicmaker2001]

@roquefortfiles

Do you think that the people seen walking on this steel beneath them heated to its total failure point would've been harmed? People were seen at the North Tower 20 mins before the collapse. From impact to collapse=102 mins. This means the steel was heated up for 80 mins before these people were seen walking on this steel. Same ol' hat. Debunked long time ago..try again.

[roquefortfiles]

@muzicmaker2001 Construction manager? !! Personally i would take what Les Robertson said with a little more weight. Yes the building was designed for the impact of a 707. But the fuel load was not taken in to consideration. And the impact was based on the plane flying..approach speed,.. slow. Not roaring in at 540mph with a full fuel load. Double the speed and the impact is QUADRUPLED .. not doubled.

There is a reason both towers failed at impact floors. A REASON!! and it aint CD

[muzicmaker2001]

@roquefortfiles

I'm guessing it doesn't matter that the WTC Construction Manager stated that the building could sustain multiple plane impacts? Who cares, right? Useless information?

watch?v=64W8bzXfGCA

[roquefortfiles]

@muzicmaker2001 Where did the tower start to collapse? Along the East wall.. Why? Because the plane took out support along that area. Fire weakened the flooring along there. (CLEARLY visible in videos). The outer wall can be seen to be buckling inward as much as a foot along here. A line of flooring snaps all at once and lets go. Without the lateral support of the flooring... FORGET IT!!

Exterior wall fails without the flooring. The flooring is the key. Les Robertson even said so.

[roquefortfiles]

@muzicmaker2001 Fine. OK!! She is a real person. Great!! I am saying the video you were showing me is faked. It quite obviously is. Who would photograph such a significant bit of footage for 48 frames?? NO ONE!! You would be zooming in and getting as much of it as you could. The fire was on the other side of the building and along the East wall.. which is WHERE the tower failed. So who cares about some lady trying to get air on the other side. Who wouldn't?? it aint no revelation

[muzicmaker2001]

@roquefortfiles

Again, a photo of her standing in the EXACT same manner as the video is shown in NIST's report. Look it up. I already gave you the reference. So, you have to prove that the video and NIST's photo are fake.You have yet to do so. Good luck. But, here's the big picture. People were seen standing at the impact hole just before the collapse. Heat usually spreads uniformly thru steel and does not concentrate in only one spot. Welcome to reality...

[roquefortfiles]

@muzicmaker2001 All i am referring to is the video of her. I am sure she is a real person. The video is quite OBVIOUSLY doctored. (if you can't spot a looped cycled clip i got some land for you). Do you think someone shooting the tower (after THIS horrific event) is going to turn their camera off after 48 frames of some chick waving???!! (how fucking stupid are you??) What would you do? (Ohh 48 frames.. that's enough!!! lets go!!) and this is the crap you stand behind?? Sad dude.

[muzicmaker2001]

@roquefortfiles

LMAO!! Oh, wait. She's real now but the heat was on the other side? Did that side of the building collapse first? No? When you are proving wrong again and again, just keep repeating, "Who cares?" or "Another useless point." You're full of so much BS is beyond funny. You're killing me.

[roquefortfiles]

@muzicmaker2001 I am sure allot of people who possibly survived were probably on their way to the opening if they could get there. If you bother to look at it the fire was concentrated on the OTHER side of the building. So Edna.. real person? whatever..(the video is a looped shot and there is no doubt in my mind it is). your point does not prove anything because the fire was on the other side of the impact area. So someone standing there is hardly a revelation. Another useless point!!

[roquefortfiles]

@muzicmaker2001 talking about that chick seen at WTC 1 impact hole. That is a bunch garbage That footage is faked. It is nothing but a video loop put in to that giant hole. It is a bunch of Youtube truther nonsense. I have seen VERY high quality video of the WTC 1 impact area for almost the entire length of the event to collapse. There aint no lady standing there. And believe me the chick shooting it would have been zoomed right to it if there was.

You fall for an awful lot of nonsense