Saving Lives with Designer Babies? - Alan Trounson
Top Comments
All Comments (31)
-
@oLiViArOcKiNsOn122 they're embryos not babies
-
@oLiViArOcKiNsOn122 Lawl. You do understand that all those 'babies' were just going to be another component of the menstrual cycle?
-
Finally, we'll have a very bright and beautiful looking future. lol
-
They are not babies but collections of 64 cells or so. These are called blastocysts. We cannot refer to them as human because they lack a nervous system and thus are not individuals.
-
Out of 200 embryos 1 is selected. That's 200 babies if 1 is chosen, thats 199 dead babies. Saving lives? I think not.
-
technically, by removing genetically inherited diseases, you are increasing human potential. What makes people afraid of augmentation is a fallacy of thinking that they would be rendered obsolete by their children.
The ability to augment fully grown adults may be a whiles off, but it is possible to give fully grown humans augmentations through genetic manipulation as well. Its just easier to do it to embryo's because the delivery is much easier.
-
In this case I don't have a problem with it, but I can imagine how this medical technology could be misused and abused by the wrong persons.
Thats NOT design, thats artificial selection.
They are not desinging genomes, they are selecting one out many embrios based on a set criteria.
People should really stop confusing everbody by using the wrong words.
Same goes with declaring the human genome sequenced, when in fact, the data we have resembles more of swiss cheese.
Lihinel 2 years ago 13
genetics is the frontier of science! exciting shit!!!
specialmike140 2 years ago 7