Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Holes - Modern Biblical Scholarship 1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,091
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 30, 2011

This video may or may not contain images under copyright. Use of these images in this video are for the purpose of education or criticism, and fall under "Fair Use" US Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 107

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Xoroaster)

  • I agree, you have a great voice

  • @InnocuousRemark Hey, thank you! ;-D

  • Glad you are back and hope this means most of the drama is settled.

    Excellent decision for your next topic and I can't wait for more, as always.

  • @XandarsMeteor Ah, the drama goes on. Luckily, it's mostly someone else's problem, I'm just giving assistance.

    Thanks mate! ;-D

see all

All Comments (22)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @reyjacobs Xerxes and Artaxerxes are mentioned as well. Daniel has a Seleucid Kings list in chapter 11. It's figurative, but its pretty much all there.

    At first, I thought maybe Judaism was a version of Zoroastrianism. And that may still be. But their texts indicate two possibilities there. It could indicate Zoroastrian influence, but it could also indicate "Nostalgia". If they were putting together their history for the Septuagint, the Greek influence would have been marginalized.

  • Not only did Thucidydes live through that war, he was also a victim of the plague in Athens (which he survived) which he describes in horrid detail. That's a far cry from any claim to validity for any of the biblical works.

  • @AuntieDiluvian hehe, very true.  ;-D

  • @Xoroaster It's not pointless until the last christian stops believing it - we have to debunk it, and if that means bringing all the holes in it to light, keep on.

  • @AuntieDiluvian I'm beginning to think that is true. Biblical scholarship began from a point of these books being authored early, and it still requires those early dates to be a part of Modern scholarship. I think we should just start over. It's mostly pointless.

  • interesting! I am reading a book at the moment that advocates the end of biblical scholarship, because it's pointless. It's written by a biblical scholar!

  • Another fine exert with excellent narration. You should be on the radio, but don't sell out there. Maybe audible books or something. You have the voice.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more