An Honest IPCC Scientist Tackles 'ClimateGate'

An IPCC climate scientist bravely took "ClimateGate" head-on, and called for "serious reforms" of the global scientific community. This video, taken by The Heartland Institute Feb. 2, 2010 at a climate conference not friendly to "deniers," presents the highlights of this remarkable lecture.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Heartland-Institute
• ClimateGate
• IPCC
• Sprigg
• EUEC
• climate
• global-warming
• glaciergate
• environment
• carbon
• CO2
• Environment-and-Climate-News
• ECN

[jlakely1]

Sprigg led the technical review of the IPCC's first climate report in 1990. Did you not get that far in the video?

[PolicyWatchdog]

Sprigg is not denying climate change in this video, and he's not even denying man may have some influence over climate. But he IS asking for some honesty and transparency and a return to SOUND SCIENCE rather than the government-grant-driven pseudo science that seems to characterize the alarmists' work on this issue.

[zingzangwallawalla]

@aerobique

William Sprigg: Head of International Technical Review Panel, the first IPCC report, 1990

[vmgqie]

@Aanthanur very rational and alarmist call me crazy 

[Aanthanur]

@vmgqie thats all you got? fuck off?

[vmgqie]

@Aanthanur is that all you got, you are very gullible, if there became available a new non fossil fuel way of making energy I am all for it, but until something revolutionary comes along, fuck off with your computer models, fuck off with your sea rise predictions, fuck off with your doom and gloom, fuck off with your solar panels and wind turbines, fuck off with your electric cars, fuck off with your carbon tax and carbon credits schemes to, in other words just fuck off

[Aanthanur]

@vmgqie you are very gullible

[vmgqie]

@Viracocha711 least my mum didn't breed a gullible fuckwit like your mother did, who can't use his own judgement and see when something is rotten to the core, like man made global warming theory is. But you believe what ever you wont, I am past trying to convince gullible idiots like you, your just another brain washed moron, well not me mother fucker. the science is dodgy and the solutions are even more fanceable. So like I said before, but this time bend over and take it in the ass

[Viracocha711]

@vmgqie WOW! What an insightful & eloquent comment! Your mother must be proud of your towering intellect!

Seriously, grow up!!

[vmgqie]

@Viracocha711 so you want to do my thinking for me, do you ass hole, you can fuck yourself cross ways. There is no man made climate change its bull shit pure and simple, your as dumb as dog shit. Go and suck al gore dick you alarmist nazi poofter

[Viracocha711]

@vmgqie The problem, YOUR PROBLEM, is you either don't care for the truth or you are allowing Denialist to do your thinking for you! Try this...Forget the 10-15 people who's emails were stolen &the work they have done.It would change nothing because there are literally thousands of scientist who study climate & are within the overall consensus that humans are warming the planet! Denialist focus on these few scientist because they can't fight the science! There is no agenda or conspiracy, PERIOD!

[Viracocha711]

@Aanthanur I KNOW! The sad thing is Dr. Sprigg did the same exact thing as Dr. Richard Muller in a talk I saw him do to an audience of Denialist...Both said "Mike's trick" when the email specifically said "Mike's NATURE Trick"! Yes, Mike's NATURE trick was published work & they made it seem like they were altering data! This has EVERYTHING to do with Professional JEALOUSY & nothing else! THANK-YOU FOR SPEAKING OUT! Even if it is YT folks can't be allowed to continue LYING!!

[Viracocha711]

Sprigg did the same thing that Muller did & that is deceptively say, "Mike's trick" When both Muller & Sprigg know 100% they are LYING by leaving out "Mike's NATURE trick"...There was NOTHING wrong with that email at all & both Dr. Sprigg & Dr. Muller altered it for their audience which is shameful! "NATURE" refers to the Scientific Journal NATURE where Michael Mann's NATURE trick was published peer review! THIS IS NOTHING BUT PURE PROFESSIONAL JEALOUSY! SAD! SAD! SAD!