Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

How to Control Gravity and Nuclear Forces

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
79,802
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 25, 2010

With the looming energy crisis, we need to start looking at alternatives. I believe that if Cold Fusion got 1/10th the funding that the LHC or Hot Fusion or Top Secret Defense Contracts get we would have Cold Fusion by now.

With maybe a few $100,000 in funding, and nano-manufacturing facilities to build the proper 50nm dimension nano-cavitated plates where deuterium would enter from one side of the plate and helium could bubble off of the other as the molecules get continually zapped with the appropriate frequency.

Richard Feynman once said of Quantum Mechanics - "Do not keep saying to yourself, if you can possibly avoid it, "But how can it be like that?" because you will get "down the drain," into a blind alley from which nobody has yet escaped. Nobody knows how it can be like that. " -On the apparent absurdities of Quantum behavior, in The Character of Physical Law (1965) Lecture 6 : Probability and Uncertainity
Now we KNOW how it can be like that...
Frank Znidarsic's Revolutionary Paper:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25455268/Control-of-the-Natural-Forces

Vt the observed velocity in cold fusion and antigravity has to do with movement of heavy protons.
It is the velocity of sound in the medium.

The velocity we get with the elastic constant of the sq rt (K/M) has to do with the speed of sound in the electrons. It normally is a much faster velocity. This is the mode light couples with. It is the speed of light in the medium.

The solution is:

speed of sound = speed of light equation #10

AlienScientist Alliance Homepage:
http://www.alienscientist.com

Some Background info about Cold Fusion for WIRED:
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/6.11/coldfusion_pr.html

Please note the correlation between the nanoparticles (50nm) and the heating (infrared vibrations ~10^14 hertz)
http://www.rexresearch.com/arata/arata.htm

Latest on Cold Fusion from SPWAR (US NAVY):
http://www.spawar.navy.mil/sti/publications/pubs/tr/1862/tr1862-vol1.pdf

The latest on Podkletnov from the European Space Agency:
http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEM0L6OVGJE_index_0.html

Yoshiaki Arata uses 50nm palladium and heats it as much as possilbe using Low end Infra Red (10^14 hertz) Again the velocity 1.094 million meters per second emerges.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ChubbTAinhonorofy.pdf

Popular Mechanics on Ning Li experiment:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/research/1281736.html

NASA assessment of the cost for this experiment:
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19990101874_1999141905.pdf

Additional Links from Frank's website:
http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/chapterf.html

Ning Li's Profile:
http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Li_Ning_20126351.aspx

Dennis Cravens Lab:
http://www.cravenslab.org/page1.aspx

Harvard stops light:
http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/2001/01.24/01-stoplight.html

MIT's Levitated Dipole Experiment:
http://www.psfc.mit.edu/ldx/

"Deuterium begins to condense when constrained in very small domains of a few tens of nanometers in dimension. It certainly can achieve a metallic deuterium state and perhaps becomes a BEC (Bose Einstein Condensate). It has been clear for some time that the reactions we work with are not a uniform bulk phenomena but rather must be produced within some unusual domain that is quite extraordinary." - Russ George
from the former D2Fusion website

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 37 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (AlienScientist)

  • Now cold fusion. I have done some preliminary reading on the subject. The Pons and Fleishman experiments failed to be reproduced. All other experiments since, including the ones going on in 2011 have also produced no reproducible results supporting cold fusion. Please do more indepth research on the subject, paying attention that the results are from their own data and not independently tested and produced.

  • @UnderManiac, Let me guess... You read Frank Close's book, maybe Huzienga and now consider yourself an expert? LOL Please stop trolling...

    Go read Steven Krivit's Book or Edmund Storms, and retire your treatise on "pathological science" to the junk heap for name calling and extreme bias.

  • "velocity of sound within the electron"

    What in the world are you talking about? This is completely ridiculous.

  • @sdrawkcabgnipytmi, "sound" is the wrong word to use, I am referring to the velocity of mechanical waves inside the nucleus. If you reformulate the Coulomb attraction of a Hydrogen atom into the form of a spring constant you get a harmonic oscillator with a specific velocity. This velocity is that of the transitional Quantum State. Sorry for the confusion in nomenclature, please try the mathematics for yourself and see that it works.

Top Comments

  • @yolouman,

    Thank You! These people claiming this is so complicated and hard to follow or understand should have paid more attention in Algebra class...

    People like you, who start learning this at an early age and begin to educate and train themselves in the ways of physics and math. You will be the future generation that builds ships to bring us to the Moon, Mars, and maybe even further. We need more brave, imaginative, and daring people to create the future generation of space technology.

see all

All Comments (522)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @AlienScientist Yes indeed, or perhaps it was Robert Park's book (search on 'voodoo science THES bdj10' to find my own review of that misleading book. Parks himself has learned a little more since then and now thinks differently). Ed Storms' lecture can be found on youtube, just enter its id, 3oHXy1knGrM, in the search box.

  • I have a question, how much does the electromagnetic force increase during the quantum transition? And if the answer is not simple where can I get more information?

  • Or as some physicists now claim, Cosmological Constant is perhaps being

    manually adjusted by seven invisible dwarfs

    wearing orange green hats.Physicists claim with noway yet to recalculate Cosmological Constant as variable, if seven invisible dwarfs with orange green hats are adjusting it we have noway of knowing what the little bastards are up to?

  • Yes your numbers are the revisions with their

    new rates for 1/137 the fine structure constant.They have found their calculations are better most of the time However they document their rates are incorrect in some equations though less so than 1/137.Thus seems further revisions needed if rates are incorrect in equations,& likely variable not a constant? Per,Cosmological Constant not constant as reported in 2011 Nobel Physics Prize findings on Supernova,& no way in place  to recalculate it. Or as

  • Reports 1/137=Quantum Transition,& 1/137 & Planck Constant are variables. Kilogram calibration can't go forward until Planck constant #s in physics=chemistry. How does Quantum Transition=Fine Structure Variable regard Einstein's EMC2 & Unified Field Theory? What effect do revisions have on:"Quantum Transition Variable/EMC2=Unified Field" or variations thereof?QTVs may vary by pie r to center forces with QTV zillions of times different from now vs BIGBANG opposite QTV=0 BLACKHOLE or=QTV BIGBANG??

  • Well, I wish I had a math brain but I do not....

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more