COMPARE all Antivirus Internet Security programs BIGGEST TEST

I tested 73237 random malwares/viruses on 38 different Internet Security suits to find out which one has the best detection rates.
These are the results
1)A-Squared Emsisoft(best detection)
2)Ikarus(best backdoor remover)
3)Kaspersky (overall WINNER)
4)Comodo
5)TrustPort
6)AVIRA
7)Antiy AVL
8)Sophos
9)McAfee
10)Dr Web
11)PC Tools Antyspyware
12)nProtect
13)AVG
14)Norman
15)F-Prot
16)eScan
17)ZoneAlarm
18)Microsoft Security Essentials
19)Panda
20)Jiangmin
21)ESET NOD32
22)Avast
23)AhnLab
24)V3 AhnLab
25)Trend Micro
26)QuickHeal
27)K7antivirus
28)Vipre
29)Kingsoft
30)AVZ Antiviral
31)ClamAV
32)Hitman Pro
33)Malwarebytes
34)WebRoot SpySweep
35)WebRoot Int.Security
36)VBA32
37)SUPERantispyware
38)CA Internt Protection
P.S.
If you're interested on getting these results on PDF file,please contact me,I'll send it to your email address.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• A-Squared
• Emsisoft
• Ikarus
• Kaspersky
• Comodo
• TrustPort
• AVIRA
• Antiy
• AVL
• Sophos
• McAfee
• Dr
• Web
• PC
• Tools
• Antspyware
• nProtect
• AVG
• Norman
• F-Prot
• eScan
• ZoneAlarm
• Microsoft
• Security
• Essentials
• Panda
• Jiangmin
• ESET
• NOD32
• Avast
• AhnLab
• V3
• Trend
• Micro
• QuickHeal
• K7antivirus
• Vipre
• Kingsoft
• AVZ
• Antiviral
• ClamAV
• Hitman
• Pro
• Malwarebytes
• WebRoot
• SpySweep
• Int.Security
• VBA32
• SUPERantispyware
• CA
• Internt
• Protection

[SUPERramanvirk]

bro. kasprsky internet security 2012 is best

[vardanologist]

@SUPERramanvirk

2012 Kaspersky?? o_0 daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaam I've to try it right away ASAP thanks for letting me know,I didn't even know there is 2012 version xD

[nosirrahx]

2 apps are tested and one scores 1% and the other scores 99%, is the 99% better? What if the 1% detected is from the last 24 hours and the 99% is from 1 moth or more ago. The 1% is far better than the 99%. For these reasons "right click a folder of random samples" testing is and has been obsolete since the windows 98 days (back when malware was far more static). If you want to produce accurate results live source testing is the only valid method. I think you will find far different leaders.

[vardanologist]

@nosirrahx

I agree with your point.Like I mentioned on video,the Malwarebytes ,for example, detected very few of these malwares because there were mixed:old and new samples.But let's not forget that nothing gets old on internet.There are still old malwares out there too .

[mangkaw321]

why is hitman pro detected only 6% and emsisoft detected 99% i thought hitmanpro is part of emsisoft and ikarus??

[bogdanmicic1]

Malwarebytes + ESET NOD32 Antivirus 4 = INDESTRUCTIBLE FORCE!

[nosirrahx]

@vardanologist The issue is nor that they still exist, it is in the way that they exist. As malware evolves the rate at which it becomes polymorphic increases at an increasing rate resulting in a very small window of relevance. If you are using online archive piles of malware all an app needs to do is add them by hash as they know the samples will never change and passing a test like this is a snap. Force them to detect what you pull directly from a live source, trust me, you will be surprised.

[winsevenholic]

@vardanology yeah :)

btw, u said newest comodo firewall.. that built-in with CIS..? :)

and.. reconfig..? how..?

end me by mssg at youtube ~

thx :)

[ALIMEHDIUTUBE]

which paid av best that will also lite on system resources?

[vardanology]

@winsevenholic

newest Comodo's Firewall(as of Jan/8/2011),however,comes with default settings configured on medium level.If a windows file tries to connect internet the firewall won't ask you which pisses me off.They still have the best Firewall.You just need to reconfigure things to get the most from their program.