We Are All Connected! What IS REAL Entanglement?

We Are All Connected! What IS REAL Entanglement? In this video Dirk Laureyssens shows in a very visual way how a non-breakable spherical 2D-surface can create 3D-structures by a simple penetration. The most simple 3D-structures have three entangled/knotted layers that make a topological UNION. But this UNION acts and is observed as a UNIT. The concept of "unbrokenness" is not know or is never used in cosmology, however it's essential. So two parts of a flat 2D-surface can created 3D-Frames of Reference (Einstein), or simply said: structured SPACE. I call these 3D-structures: topological HOLONS. These are like multi-layered boxes, or topological bells, with a covering double cup and an inner clapper. But these boxes are still part of the membrane because they are just enfolded membrane. Since the general membrane vibrates also the layers in a holon will vibrate, and will provoke local kinetic effects, local stress and specific frequencies in the holon. Each holon will have it's own frequency, composed by all it's inside sub-frequencies. That makes each holon unique. The basic idea is that the membrane is a singularity, and since a SINGULARITY CANNOT DESTROY ITSELF the holons must be manifested SUBSETS of the total system. Therefor between all objects and beings (which are all more or less complex holons) and the background membrane is a structural ELASTIC interconnectivity, where the membrane is the mediator of vibrations. This new holistic vision is in the line of geometrical thinking of Riemann, Clifford and Einstein, but now - for the first time - explains the fundamental coupling mechanism that provokes the quantum entanglement, and explains that GRAVITY is just an inherent tension property of the Membrane, and is NOT a separate force. This approach is mathematically fully correct. More info on http://www.pelastration.com/ holon_creation.html

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Entanglement
• Quantum
• singularity
• holon
• holons
• interconnectivity
• space
• membrane
• bells
• enfolding
• penetration

[animations4you]

You missed the opposite to the singularity. What it is name? multilarity?

So what is the name of the twos?

simularity? musingularity?

Noname? Allname?

It is beyond namnes!

Just sit down on your ass and you will understand after about 20 minutes!

Test to sit down - 20 minutes - 22 minutes? 23 and half minutes? It is about sitting down! But perhaps you do not dare to sit down? Going beyond all namnes!

After trying to sit down - you can tell! Let us hear of your experience sitting down.

[dirklaureyssens]

I think you missed something.

[islandbuoy4]

I love your membrane analogy...that membrane (Planck Era) is similar to the infinite space between two points...we can call that membrane a MIRROR?

Dirk, can Alice and mi join you in the fun house of mirrors created through entanglement?

namaste

Raphael

[dirklaureyssens]

Thx Raphael. You and Alice are fine holons! ;-) Indeed mirroring is an important aspect in my approach, in the sense like in molding (cfr. mold-injection). The universe is a hand-shaking system, full with energy-transfer processes between spaces, where spaces (holons) are entangled/slowed-down energy. Can we keep information in a water wave? No. But in ICE we can. Structure. With ice we can build igloos, carve numbers, make ice pipes, ice containers, to hold and distribute water in a system.

[islandbuoy4]

Dirk are you familiar with the work of Fintan Duanne, Marko Rodin, Nassim Haramein and Milo Wolff?

Everybody it seems has bits and bytes of the TRUTH...

Now human consciousness needs to bring the pieces together and make these insights work for us.

Dirk, no offence, a compliment actually.

You are a modern alchemist.

Your tubes remind me of the retorts.

[dirklaureyssens]

Hi Island, only about Milo I knew. But "holding of energy" can not happen by just a wave. Energy-holding needs isolation and a coupling. Topological holons are made by such universal coupling, called a pelastration. The Cross. The addition. Yin and Yang coupled in one Union. I dont find that with Milo. Neither with the others. I saw their nice movies, Thx. Some use sacred geometry, looking for perfection. But imo the sacred level is not the initial one, but one of the following steps. cfr Kether

[MaxErnst]

wow, the universe is so naughty

[SlyUnd3r5t4nding]

2:47 "just the tip babe, just the tip"

[islandbuoy4]

@dirklaureyssens

yes the kether >>> the kether is associated with the asymmetrical swastika...I agree with you dirk, too many of the others are using sacred geometry trying to express 'perfection'. But when I tell them "I object" to their perfect models, because matter and anti-matter are imperfect, they are asymmetrically matched, this simple truth seems to be lost on them. You said "the universe is a hand-shaking system", and our asymmetrical LEFT and RIGHT hands would be in agreement.

ciao

[gricka31]

what is this video designed to explain? and what is the explicit definition of your "topological holon"?

[rfengr]

WOW, where do you smoke your weed ? .. from these pipes Dante, ... oh yeah! wassup Mr. Cheezle!

[sk8hack]

leave science to real scientists, if you make up an interpretation, that's ok, it doesn't mean that nature acts that way, the important thing is that your predictions match what nature does, if you have predictions which cannot be tested again nature, then you theory remains uncertain. even when you success in predicting a few phenomena your theory remains uncertain. it is not until your theory matches nature in a huge amount of predictions that your theory can be plausible

[whoppix]

I'm sure this is how it works.. in the discworld.

[islandbuoy4]

@dirklaureyssens

agreed

Many theorists structure pet theories using perfection as the reference point, often defined by the perfect symmetry of a circle, sacred 'g'.

Pi as an idea seems universal, before math made the rounds.

Asymmetry of matter and anti-matter is OUR reality not symmetry.

The problem with many theorists is that they are trying to define 'god' (symmetry).

Why?

When it is clear we still do NOT have an understanding of the role of asymmetry to the human condition.

namaste

[ProsperosCloset]

Slobodan Milošević makes balloon animals - but seriously, very interesting!

[awake2012nibiru]

So anything we feel ,the singularity will feel?.That means we are just sensors.The question would be are we pasive or active sensors.But how can we choose

[awake2012nibiru]

So anything we feel ,the singularity will feel?

[dervishmadwhirler]

@Zee96969696

Yeh, he must be on LCD, and his computer has an LSD-monitor...

(heavy sarcasm implied)