Response to gothatfunk
Loading...
Loading...
220
views
Loading...
4:04
VenomFangX Returns: Hypocrisy Ensuesby BiggestOfDaddies428 views- 2:02
VenomfangX/Shawn is back (again), and as dishonest as ever!by StutteringDave1,038 views
- 0:23
stop dmca abuseby batteri76131 views
- 3:07
Free Speech Update: Cody Webber's Termination and Censortubeby TheShwaNerd806 views
- 0:03
Step 1by rozeboosje1,300 views
- 1:28
How to lose your channel on You Tubeby ADF20370 views
- 8:25
About rozeboojes petitionby Manaborn619151 views
- 0:11
Letter to YouTubeby rozeboosje816 views
- 7:51
Video Letter to YouTube Staff - DMCA & Flagging Abuseby AbdultheImpailler416 views
- 7:41
Apathyby rozeboosje4,904 views
- 2:35
GOD COMMANDS YOU TO ACT NOW!by premed2458 views
- 8:32
Censorship and Freedom of Speech (Part Four)by ExaggeratedElegy412 views
- 0:27
YouTube Can You Hear Us? Can You Help To Cheer Us? YT?... YT?... YT?... (2)by premed296 views
- 8:54
And this is how.by rozeboosje1,530 views
- 8:33
War (what is it good for)by rozeboosje1,107 views
- 3:43
Let's make it real, YouTubeby rozeboosje1,192 views
- 8:29
A bully or just opinionated?by rozeboosje906 views
- 2:18
FIGHT FOR FREEDOM OF SPEECH!by mbnp1701803 views
- 9:57
Young man, there's no need to feel down!by rozeboosje2,377 views
- 0:03
censortube press releaseby rozeboosje599 views
Ok, I have added CiphersSon and godlessmessiah.
Zlibservacratican 2 years ago
Here's the idea: rather than sending the DMCA claim by e-mail, send it by post. That means it has to be processed by a human being, and since it's a legal document they CANNOT ignore it. But, and this is important, ONLY include an e-mail address for them to contact you so you can remain anonymous. Then when your sock account receives the DMCA notification, respond by post again, so AGAIN someone needs to go through the hassle of processing your response.
rozeboosje 2 years ago
No, but I got my ass covered from a legal perspective, that's all that counts there. The e-mail got sent, and I got a confirmation of receipt. I can legally assume that they bothered to read it.
rozeboosje 2 years ago
Did they ever respond?
Zlibservacratican 2 years ago
Ah, I see. This actually makes it harder for YT to pay attention. Is there a possible way to break the automated policies? My guess is that all DMCA's go to a server that specifically handles them, but do we know the capacity limits of that server? You see where I'm getting at.
Zlibservacratican 2 years ago
See my "letter to YouTube" of about a month ago.
rozeboosje 2 years ago
There wouldn't be any trouble as such. The only party that would be entitled to seek prosecution is the injured party, which in this case would be your own sock account, so why would you sue yourself?
Having said that, the only problem I can perceive is that all these false DMCAs will be handled by YT's own automated policies, and the staff won't even notice it, so I would say that participants should respond to their own DMCAs in writing forcing humans in YT to deal with it ;-)
rozeboosje 2 years ago
Really? I just need to know if there is anyway people can be sure that they won't be in any major trouble if they tried it.
Zlibservacratican 2 years ago
I know what your saying, I just don't agree to support him, in spite of my major dislike of false DMCAs.
Zlibservacratican 2 years ago