Ron Paul at Ames IA Straw Poll Debate (Fair Use) Pt 1

Ron Paul's speech at the Ames IA straw poll.
Saturday 8-11-2007.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This post may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material in this post is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml If you wish to use copyrighted material from this post for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Dr
• Ron
• Paul
• congressmen
• 2008
• presidential
• candidate
• ia
• ames
• straw
• poll
• 5th
• place
• win

[t0kt0k]

Wow, I agree with almost nothing he says here. But I'm still going to vote for him because at least he understands that the president is not, and should not be, a dictator. I don't think the same can be said of anyone else running in either party.

[FUKuViacom]

niginit and t0kt0k

I've let you go on because I don't unduly censor but at the point you leave philosophical debating behind and get into flame war I say move on down the line and find a place to piss in other than my videos. Capice?

Thanks.

[SmokeTheHerb]

Wow 4 years ago. Ron Paul just got second this time around! Almost won.

[t0kt0k]

Hardly a "flame war". Check niginit's comment history and check mine. One of these qualifies, one does not. When one person holds a flame war by himself, it's just spamming. Delete away if it makes you happy.

[niginit]

ummm i only see a problem with you missunderstanding of what i said.

you said life begins at conception i was just paraphrazing you and you ARE wrong because that makes all the difference, if life begins @ conception then there is no agruement.

leave it to the inteligencia on this one buddy:)

[t0kt0k]

I said:

[["Life" begins at conception]]

You said:

[[well then you are wrong, the life DOES BEGIN there]]

See the problem now?

[niginit]

either way i think DR. RON PAUL has more knowledge about it than either of us and is obviously more qualified to speak his opinion. oh sry are you a doctor of medicine?:)

ya didnt think so

[niginit]

like i said, this shouldnt even be an issue. if we took a look at the people having abortions and what causes them to come to that point this wouldnt be an issue at all.

just like welfare, get it now lil guy?

[niginit]

"I don't believe that a fetus has human rights. "Life" begins at conception, but it has no more or less rights than any other nascent multi-cellular organism."

no more or LESS rights?

perhaps you should try thinking before you tell me to try reading.

you made absolutely no point and yet made a dick of yourself. gj

[t0kt0k]

Try reading.

[niginit]

well then you are wrong, the life DOES BEGIN there, if you think it doesnt then try and knock a girl up and wait a few months and see what happens. BUT i dont think that is the problem, its just like the welfare problem. the problem is that people have children without thinking twice or just arent ready or ignorant. you dont need abortions you need smarter people who value human life! just like people who cant figure out how to make money or just dont care to and rely on welfare.