M Theory Part 1

Membrane Theory - Parallel Universes Part 1

• Category

  Science & Technology

[ThePhiloctopus]

Dramatic lead up

Scientist saying something

Narrator repeating it

Another scientist saying the same thing a different way

Dumbed down & irrelevant illustration

Dramatic pause

Repeat

[Shakyric Lawson]

You sir are being biased in your reasoning. The logic we command is extremely limited. In fact, this logic is limited only to the brain. So what one might consider illogical another might not. It could be that the Universe comes out of absolutely nothing.Or it could be that it simply came from something we can't comphrehend at our current level of understanting. But scientist are finding the answer to the beggining,as they always do, whether or not it is a creator or another cause altogerther.

[Michael I]

Shak, the Universe has CERTAINLY come from something we don't understand, and at any level our understanding evolves to, it'll still be "ust out of our grasp". Comedian Dara O'Briain said: "Science knows it doesn't know everything, otherwise, it would stop."

[JNathanK2011]

We are gods acid trip. That's my theory, but it won't ever be popular because it involves both the words "God" and "acid trip".

[JNathanK2011]

lmao

[henk henksoon]

We are doing for as long as we exist.

[Phil Francis]

It is very hard to have a 'theory of everything' when you are only using 0.01% of the known universe in your equations. The Electric Universe on the other hand uses the other 99.99% (plasma) as well and works with Quantum Mechanics. On a spiritual level (which of course fits in rather well with QM) we are individual neurons connected by the electricity running through out the whole universe, or as it could be described God's brain /watch?v=NenomdAZ11M&feature=s­hare&list=UUvHqXK_Hz79tjqRosK4­tWYA

[nissengummihone]

So this means there actually IS a world without religion?

[8e500]

There’s something about the quality of those questions that make one suspect we’re barking up the wrong tree; we’re not going to be able to get an answer. I cannot see how qualities like love, pain and fear will ever be quantified and find themselves in an equation. I can’t see how you’re ever going to get a simple, single way of looking at things that encapsulates everything we know about what it is to be human.

[8e500]

But we have technology – we outsource problems to computers. Aren’t we already involved in some form of directed evolution? No. Certainly computers are able to help us with calculations that take us unaided much, much longer. But computers can do only what we, namely our brains, tell them to do. If you’re doing fundamental science, what you’re trying to do all the time is to come up with new thoughts.

[8e500]

it was a question of avoiding predators, finding food and shelter, finding a mate and passing on your genes. Well, already we have managed somehow to go a long way further than that. Knowing about DNA, or the Big Bang, doesn’t necessarily help you to survive to a point where you can mate. But we have to be very careful not to get carried away in thinking that the brain is capable of understanding absolutely everything.