Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Open Government: Transparency Could Work!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
108 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 5, 2008

In this video I ask a hypothetical question. Could transparent government work? First, this is purely hypothetic, it is too far off what we have always had and known to every actually happen, so this is really a though exercise.

I understand the right to privacy. People's financial records, medical records, home addresses and such should not be a matter of public record... but why shouldn't our own government records be open to us individually?

The example, perhaps oversimplified, given in this video is of an imaginary Crack Cocaine dealer. If they are under investigation, why not inform them of the investigation in an attempt to stop the offending behavior more immediately? If the idea intrigues you, then watch my video.

As usual, I call for examples were transparent government would not work. Why must we be so insistent on proving guilt and locking people up, rather than putting a stop to the behavior. If the DEA is monitoring a drug dealer and is allowing a drug deal to go down in order to collect evidence, in some ways, aren't they an accessory? Shouldn't they be stopping the offending action as immediately as possible, rather than just trying to build a case? If someone dies due to a drug overdose that was monitored by surveillance by not interceded, in some ways doesn't that make the DEA somewhat responsible for the overdose death?

I guess what I am really questioning here is the purpose of government intervention? Is the intent to really protect the people, or is it to play a game of gotcha so that we may incarcerate as many people as possible? With the budget problems our government is currently having, perhaps we should be focusing on the true intent of protecting the people from harm, rather than spending tax money on punishing people. Just a though. What are yours?

Thanks for reading. Read all you want, I'll write more.
-Chris Corsello (aka NorCalCorsello)
December 2008

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (NorCalCorsello)

  • Open Source government. :)

  • Yes! Thank you. Government records are eventually going to be transparent anyway. The amount of data, the interconnectedness of networks... there will be no way for government to communicate within itself and still keep secrets.

see all

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • they do that in italy for taxes

  • well... I think the example is you gave is bad, but the idea is good.

    The thing is:

    innocent until the opposite is proven

    They whould not let happen an crime, the police simply whould leave alone an innocent

    PS: look at wikipedia for "Informational self-determination" I think that goes pretty much in your direction.

  • The best answer I can give is that I don't have enough background in this to really flesh out the idea.

    Hmmm.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more