Physics 8.1.03a - The Inverse Square Law
Loading...
12,633
Uploader Comments (derekowens)
see all
All Comments (17)
-
Awesome vid!
-
This video has given me such a better understanding of the entire concept. Thankyou very much!!!
-
hi
-
thanks, really helped.
-
@bomberfun1 you would have to take into account that light is absorbed and reflected off the air particles.
-
you rock!
-
Not sure a laser follows the same law. It doesnt spread, or spreads very little
-
Great job, what software did you use to make this live presentation if i might ask.
Loading...
I have a question, which is the only thing about this i dont quite understand. do u have to start at one metre? what if you start at 1.5, double that and at 3 metres away you have 4x the size (1/4 the light). but at that same point. (if you started ay 1 metre away) you would have 9x the original. or would that just be because your squares are smaller then, starting closer
metalupyourass9 8 months ago
@metalupyourass9 Yes, I think you have the right idea. At 3 meters, you have 1/4 the light intensity that you have at 1.5 meters. Increasing the distance by a factor of 2 will cut the intensity to 1/4. And yes, if you start at 1 meter, then the squares you are imagining are smaller than if you start at 1.5 meters. At 3m, you will have 1/9 the light that you have at 1m, and 1/4 the light you have at 1.5m.
derekowens 8 months ago
awesome... good job, good video. easy to understand.
do sound waves follow the inverse square law too?
presbarkeep 2 years ago 2
Yes, I believe they do. Anything that propagates in three dimensions should follow an inverse square law.
derekowens 2 years ago
For gravity, it is F = (G m1 m2) / r^2.
For other inverse square relationships there are different equations, but they all have a similar form, that is, they all have a variable squared in the deonominator.
derekowens 2 years ago