Cloverfield - 2 monsters?
Top Comments
All Comments (489)
-
He can swim end of the story!
-
@superfawful65 its the same with the star wars nerds, with the "who shot first, gredo or han" i personally like the star wars movies. but. i dont care about those little things at all.
-
Even if this were true it wouldn't make much sense since the creators described Cloverfield as a lost infant in the extras on the DVD. So, why would they avoid mentioning a second monster if they'd tell us so much about him? =|
-
they are exactly the same the teeth is very small on the first picture and on second one we are rigth in fron of him so there is only one moster!!!!
this is a lie!!
-
Why are people getting so worked up over a fucking movie?
-
Another reason you diddnt say was that the "first monster" is about the same size as 3 buildings and the "second monster" is about half the size of 1 building. But there is still only 1 monster because with movies as complex as Cloverfield you need many animation workers (check the credits) and the ones that worked on animating the monster did thing a little bit differently. But you can have any opinion you want.
-
@Audiodrainer ...whatever im just calming the other peeps down...
-
In the scene that the camera guy gets eatten, the monster isn't being attacked or bombed. The jets and military must have been attacking something else. It's not like they lost sight of the monster or took a smoke break from attacking.
-
@MagicXenomorph J.J. Abramm's does not simply make a mistake. The amount of work, time and secrets he puts into shows/movies are incredible. He meant to do this.
-
Are you retarded? On the first still that you posted, you can see the 4 inner teeth! Well, you can see the far-right one, angled back into the mouth, towards the left outer-tooth.
wow seriously do u really think this
moneyroxraice 6 months ago 12
jeez....dont you think its just possible the people who made this made a mistake?
MagicXenomorph 4 months ago 11