Hominids

the real story of how we got here

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• human
• evolution
• hominids
• ape
• to
• man
• neanderthal
• habilis
• homo
• apes
• bible
• philosophy
• debate
• atheism
• atheist

[procommenter]

Evil plans are attractively packaged and are reliant upon the duplicity of moral people to get implemented as exemplified by our brave soldiers in Iraq & Afghanistan passing out candy and teddy bears on Monday, and killing scores of children with depleted uranium on Tuesday.

[Attaturk5]

@procommenter you a crazy tea party terrorist.

[procommenter]

In Darwinian posters depicting the mythical line of ascension from simian to human: Modern Man leads the parade with monkeys, and the monkeyed, bringing up the rear.

[Attaturk5]

@procommenter evolution is a fact look at the evidence and you will know you are dumb

[procommenter]

@Attaturk5 : How many tattoos have you?

[Attaturk5]

@procommenter none and you creationist

[Attaturk5]

@iamhewho no need to yell idiot creationist. go eat your stupid pills and vote for tea party terrorists just stay out of intelligent sane people's business. Maybe you should not vote you're most likely to stupid. LOL

[04suzuka]

With the fact that giants existed and the fact that their skeletal remains have been hidden from the masses thrown into the mix.... this video is out the window. We didnt evolve in this order. This is what some want to believe. But its wrong.

[iamhewho]

@Attaturk5 if you are capable of thinking about it people who beleive in darwin are creaionists, you actually beleive a single celled bacteria just created itself out of nothing and then created every form of life on this planet , ROFL before you hit back with your useual defence machanism for anyone who would dare question darwin , im not a creationist.just like einstein darwin is totally outdated and there a loads of holes in his theory, you no nout about macro evolution .

[iamhewho]

@friendsofthepenan a half mammal half reptile would be a missing link wouldnt it . it would show transition between speceis ,macro eveloution' , just like the missing link in humans which they will never find and if they did they would need about 30 of them to show a gradual transition to prove darwin is wright which he isnt and thats why they havnt , there is no evidaence to this day of any species crossing into or with anoyother species reptiles mammals insects,

[iamhewho]

@friendsofthepenan im not a creationist by the way, that seems to be the social response to anyone who questions darwin, just like it was until einstein got proven wrong with the nutrinos going faster than light , why cant accept there is not a shred of evidance for macro eveloution, i reckon i am 50 yrs ahead of you in science cos i know macro eveloution is wrong, ''we all eveloved from a single organism '' '''which cretaed itself' hahahahahahahaha stupid, cmon people, think

[iamhewho]

@nancy6ify humans are only 250k yrs old as a species we are not apes and am talking genetics and dna, it is fact we are not apes we are a different species which could not have evolved over time because like i said humans appeared suddenly around 250k yrs ago this is going with the mitacondrial dna reseach that suggests we originated in south africa just like the simarians said we did , there is no evidence to this day of macro eveloution,im not a creationist, but thats the big deal 

[iamhewho]

@dirtyharry9111 problem with your statement is they are all still the same species you just described micro eveloution there is not one shred of evidence to this day of macro eveloution, im not a creationist by the way i just know darwin was wrong

[iamhewho]

@friendsofthepenan we are not apes, hominoids are, hence the prehumans are there ancestors that is why they were hair covered because they are now, we have got nothing to do with the prehumans which is why we are so different, we share 50% dna with mice does that mean we are half mice? 2% is millions of strands of dna and is a big difference, your still stook thinking we evolved from them over time via natural selection but the prehumans are still about which debunks that.

[friendsofthepenan]

@iamhewho Yes we can agree they are bipedal apes. their brain capacity increases sequentially but for the early ones at least was chimp like, as for the hair that is a guess either way as there is no EVIDENCE for it. Where we differ is that this describes our most probable ancestors as we are bipedal apes (some with more hair than others) with 98% the same DNA as chimps. All cultures have creation myths (and this one has had a lot of interpretation). Why not believe the aboriginal dreamtime?

[iamhewho]

@iamhewho they had no tools,fire, lanuage,society they didnt have 4000 genetic defects they didnt have a layer of fat under the skin, they did have long arms imense strenght etc, what possible natural selection scenario would cause a species only 250k yrs old(us) to loose all that strenght arm reach nocturnal vision and most of all lose 2 chromosones that doesnt happen thats not natural selection , we would be superior if we had those attributes so why lose em ? cos we never had them