To add to my last 4 posts. People working in cities any way would probably prefer to work out of such locations and live there and the city could be broken up into micro communities, ie Students and Aged care ,Pensioners. This could possibly take up half of the people on earth living in these cities and that Free's up alot of energy and natural resources. I would not completely dismiss the Zeitgeist concept at all.
The main worry is the no currency means full control, I don't agree with that.
To add to my last 3 posts. I believe there should be very little unemployed as anyone on unemployment should have to take up study to better themselves and personal equity so there are no free loaders and no idle minds causing crime. The student allowance should be raised to encourage this and the unemployment system needs to be more proactive in encouraging people to take up some form of education or training. No one should be on unemployment for more than 6 months.
To add to my last 2 posts. People should be able to live out side of such cities and with alot of natural resources saved by having such communities as proposed by the Zeitgeists the people living out side should be able to live a relatively normal life.
I don't think the idea of building cities to encourage freeloading is healthy as people are supposed to work and think. To give away your own personal equity is to give up your ambitions and freedom.
To add to my last post. I don't like the attitudes of some of these Zeitgeist replying to posts saying if people don't except the concept then they will die. It sounds like a dictatorship system, A model of the proposed city style could fit in to the world without the bullshit of dictatorship. These could also be used in poor countries but people should be free to come and go as the feel without micro chips etc. Prison systems could also use this model and run self sufficient. TBC
I agree with you on the over all concept Alex But i think the basic model can be used for Students, Unemployed, Aged care and retirement, as well as for anyone who chooses to live in a community like this.
This would help with world resources and will create jobs in the constructions of such cities.
I say it definitely has its place on earth but not as an only optune.
I don't agree with wind turbines being so close to the city and must allow for expansion. To be continued.
Okay yes Alex has some good points, but a lot of it is nit picking & getting them on technicalities that they never expanded on as they're limited to 2 hours.
Could it be that he has a bias against the movie because it talks about Christianity & other religions being nonsense.
Seeing as Alex believes in Christianity and all.
I think Joe Rogan was right when he says that he agrees with 70% of what Alex Jones says.
Peter Joseph and Alex Jones are both wrong, but in opposite ways. Market freedom is a great tool for local optimization, but you have to curb its excesses at a national scale. The profit motive can be horribly destructive when you feed it via large transfers of wealth or when it gets monopoly constraint over entire industries, but you can create a system that blocks that, but still rewards people based on production. In short, both are wrong because there is hope.
To add to my last 4 posts. People working in cities any way would probably prefer to work out of such locations and live there and the city could be broken up into micro communities, ie Students and Aged care ,Pensioners. This could possibly take up half of the people on earth living in these cities and that Free's up alot of energy and natural resources. I would not completely dismiss the Zeitgeist concept at all.
The main worry is the no currency means full control, I don't agree with that.
Stringyheads 1 week ago
To add to my last 3 posts. I believe there should be very little unemployed as anyone on unemployment should have to take up study to better themselves and personal equity so there are no free loaders and no idle minds causing crime. The student allowance should be raised to encourage this and the unemployment system needs to be more proactive in encouraging people to take up some form of education or training. No one should be on unemployment for more than 6 months.
Stringyheads 1 week ago
To add to my last 2 posts. People should be able to live out side of such cities and with alot of natural resources saved by having such communities as proposed by the Zeitgeists the people living out side should be able to live a relatively normal life.
I don't think the idea of building cities to encourage freeloading is healthy as people are supposed to work and think. To give away your own personal equity is to give up your ambitions and freedom.
Stringyheads 1 week ago
To add to my last post. I don't like the attitudes of some of these Zeitgeist replying to posts saying if people don't except the concept then they will die. It sounds like a dictatorship system, A model of the proposed city style could fit in to the world without the bullshit of dictatorship. These could also be used in poor countries but people should be free to come and go as the feel without micro chips etc. Prison systems could also use this model and run self sufficient. TBC
Stringyheads 1 week ago
I agree with you on the over all concept Alex But i think the basic model can be used for Students, Unemployed, Aged care and retirement, as well as for anyone who chooses to live in a community like this.
This would help with world resources and will create jobs in the constructions of such cities.
I say it definitely has its place on earth but not as an only optune.
I don't agree with wind turbines being so close to the city and must allow for expansion. To be continued.
Stringyheads 1 week ago
Okay yes Alex has some good points, but a lot of it is nit picking & getting them on technicalities that they never expanded on as they're limited to 2 hours.
Could it be that he has a bias against the movie because it talks about Christianity & other religions being nonsense.
Seeing as Alex believes in Christianity and all.
I think Joe Rogan was right when he says that he agrees with 70% of what Alex Jones says.
skullcrushernz 1 week ago
@smearcamp YOU GO FIRST....muppet
allgoodand27 2 weeks ago
Peter Joseph and Alex Jones are both wrong, but in opposite ways. Market freedom is a great tool for local optimization, but you have to curb its excesses at a national scale. The profit motive can be horribly destructive when you feed it via large transfers of wealth or when it gets monopoly constraint over entire industries, but you can create a system that blocks that, but still rewards people based on production. In short, both are wrong because there is hope.
sfjeff1089 2 weeks ago
Alex Jones did very well commenting on this film. A lot of good info but a lot of bad solutions and twisting of reality.
jneil2007 3 weeks ago
@smearcamp go take the venom out ur snake if it makes you feel better pal!
MultiCesh 4 weeks ago