@acidbath32 no. the 'existence as information' approach to the basics of universe is yet new. it is hard to interpret or make any solid consequence of this in many theories, but for some it works great. what we know is we can explain some complex parts of universe with that approach. so, in that regard, indeed, the solar system never ever repeats the same state twice, as he says. but what consequences this has, is unknown.
@unity100 nobody has ever misunderstood that. the planar model is just used to illustrate a few basic points about the solar system, like distances between and sizes/orbits of the planets and moons. And I was actually referring to his theories on torus manifolds - it's entirely ad hoc. There's nothing substantial to work with, either to validate or refute. But he treats it as fact.
does writing "scientific" reality make it more true than just a reality? does it make you feel like a "scientist"?
Incidentally. Relative motion is not normally considered a "scientific" reality, it is accepted as a "real" reality. Like the reality that you will never make your living with your intellect. No science needed.
@acidbath32 no. the 'existence as information' approach to the basics of universe is yet new. it is hard to interpret or make any solid consequence of this in many theories, but for some it works great. what we know is we can explain some complex parts of universe with that approach. so, in that regard, indeed, the solar system never ever repeats the same state twice, as he says. but what consequences this has, is unknown.
unity100 2 days ago
everything is moving,,, even the idea of moving, i am moving where the pope can't find me.
NORGOTHURLAK 2 days ago
76 people do not have a starship
NORGOTHURLAK 2 days ago
@unity100 so its just an illusion of time/distance measurement?
acidbath32 2 days ago
yep and the earth is flat. hey!!! can i have some of what your smoking?? looks to be some killer weed.
kgmetcalfe 3 days ago
@4Dmetricology Youtube comment of the day award. Here you go.
psychwardmovies 4 days ago
@unity100 nobody has ever misunderstood that. the planar model is just used to illustrate a few basic points about the solar system, like distances between and sizes/orbits of the planets and moons. And I was actually referring to his theories on torus manifolds - it's entirely ad hoc. There's nothing substantial to work with, either to validate or refute. But he treats it as fact.
zapproowsdower 4 days ago
@unity100
does writing "scientific" reality make it more true than just a reality? does it make you feel like a "scientist"?
Incidentally. Relative motion is not normally considered a "scientific" reality, it is accepted as a "real" reality. Like the reality that you will never make your living with your intellect. No science needed.
4Dmetricology 5 days ago
interesting theory...........
jonathonlb 5 days ago
@soar1111 haha good thinking
thatguy928 5 days ago