Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Shadow Party Attempts To RIG 2008 Elections!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
1,428
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 18, 2007

We can clearly see by the PHOTO OF THE TWO FIREMEN that the hoax is intentional. This is NOT a sincere mistake made by a well-meaning person who suspects that Dick Cheney may have been involved in a "false flag operation" on 9/11. THE PHOTO IS A LIE. THE PHOTO WAS DELIBERATELY CROPPED.

There are a number of things they claim with this photo. One is the time line. They say the photo shows TWO FIREMEN which means this was taken during the rescue operation which only lasted two weeks.

Let's think about that. One might reasonably assume that there would be no need of fireman after the rescue operations. Does this PHOTO really suggest that the cut on the STEEL COLUMN was made very close to September 11? Does the cropped version of the photo suggest that THE CUT was done SHORTLY BEFORE OR DURING THE COLLAPSE?

They claim that the angle of the cut can't be created by a CUTTING TORCH and is designed to CAUSE THE BUILDING TO FALL in a certain direction.

A WIDE ANGLE VIEW of this same scene clearly shows that this is DURING THE CLEAN-UP OPERATION.

What the photo really shows is a glimpse inside the minds of the "theorists." It shows us the true mentality of the maggot-infested TRASH who propagate so-called "911 Truth" theories.

From day one, the Truth Movement (which gave vent to the RON PAUL REVOLUTION) was a deliberately contrived hoax. It was all a lie.

The faked photo of TWO firemen is TYPICAL of the 911 Truth modus operandi. They did the same thing in regard to the Pentagon attack whereby they showed the security camera footage over and over again (because it was not in a position to record the crash) while IGNORING all the evidence that clearly pointed to the FACT that an American Airlines jet certainly did crash there. This sick fakery was carried out by perverted antiwar leftists employed by radical Islamic governments, such as the UAE, that actively sympathized with the goals of the 19 hijackers.

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • I sense your anger from your presentation. It seems that your anger lies more with his popularity than with the live legend. Enough of the ranting of the scandal you found in his trash can and start the assault on his core issues. This will serve to fuel your anger and get the word out on R.P.

  • what the fuck just happened? you could have at least written something at the beginning of this video to help us. something like "drop acid now". that video told me nothing of what you believe. i'm open minded but i'm not a code breaker. this was some confusing shit.

see all

All Comments (36)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • where did you do your research?haha even dick cheney says "the evidence linking Bin Laden to 9/11 has not been forthecoming" and nobody would love this evidence more than Cheney because then it would take the heat off him and his think tank buddies who planned this.

  • why did the buildings fall evenly? If that steel melted and sagged one part of the building had to have been must more "saggy" than another part of the building that wasn't affected as much by the fire. This would cause a tumbling and pulling effect. The buildings would not fall evenly. There would stil be parts of the building standing. The whole building would never fall.

  • Nope. But I am fond of the Jews. (Most of them.)

  • You must be a Jew as my reading of your comment equivalates.

  • And if you repeat something enough times you tend to believe it. Sorry "Truth is treason in the empire of lies"

  • Larry Silverstein is not a rescue worker but technically the expression "pull the firemen" is interchangeable with "pull out" (withdraw) the firemen or "pull off" (desist or draw back from) the rescue operation itself. Don't feel bad. I know how difficult it is to learn English as a second language.

  • The fire melted steel and the building came down at freefall speed. And spill the beans said " we decided to pull it" meaning the firemen out of the building? No sorry. Obvious what happened.

  • First off, forget the nonsense about "open fire can't melt steel." NO ONE ever suggested that steel melted.

    In the OLD DAYS, buildings had concrete uprights. Modern buildings have steel coated in a flame resistant insulation. That insulation is not adequate in a very hot fire.

    Exposed to intense heat, a steel member softens and is then SUDDENLY crushed under the heavy load it can no longer support. Firemen know this. Its a death trap for them.

  • Heard that version before.  Quite a bit reaching for me. But of course it convinced you. EOM

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more