Microsoft Success Driven by 'Constant Learning' - Andrea Taylor
Top Comments
All Comments (10)
-
@nadadreamer haha true but i bet you own a 360...
-
she reminds me of joe the plumber
-
microsoft success is driven by the fact that they were early. they are not innovative in any way anymore, their current success solely depends on suppressing competition
-
It was all about constant learning;
not about cornering the market by driving out the small business or making monopolistic deals with the good majority of hardware companies~
no, it couldn't have been that!
or how about "borrowing" technology from businesses big & small, or Gates pushing for 'free trade' agreements around the globe?
Nah, his success is all just driven by 'constant learning'.
heh.
-
Microsoft Success Driven by forcing corporations as well individual users to use their products. Tho I have to say, since sp3 I am happy user of Windows XP who's not going to upgrade to Vista or Windows 7
-
If the purpose of philanthropy is to "help" people by "providing [indoctrinating] people with a way of thinking and being that allows [requires] them to be open and receptive to constant learning [struggling to keep up with what the system wants them to do]" then IMO that sort of philanthropy should be outlawed.
-
i was expecting a comment EXACTLY like that :D and for good reason.
by constant learning must mean constantly stealing ideaes and tech from other companies
nadadreamer 2 years ago 6
Constant learning=
Constant theft of competitors intellectual property.
Constant monopolistic tactics.
Constant insistence on proprietary technology and closed and centralized standards.
entropyfu 2 years ago 3