C.S. Lewis and Modus Tollens
Loading...
Link to this comment:
Uploader Comments (Cimbolic)
Video Responses
All Comments (19)
-
Jesus- liar, lunatic, lord, or LIBELED. Given the abundant inconsistencies in the gospels, the habits of ancient biographers, and what the early Christians had at stake, I'd definitely say the put words into Jesus' mouth. Yep, CS Lewis left one option out.
-
I was having the same flashbacks !
-
And I yours. :)
-
You always help me, beauty.
I love the way your mind works.
-
Cimbolic, my love: going back to the Bible text behind the C.S. Lewis quip: Christ CLAIMED to be the Lord over 400 times. No offense, but only a bad scholar would not know that.
Now, either He is or is not. If untrue, He's lying or crazy. But if true...then it's a question of ADMITTING His Claim.
How one GETS to that admittance, is a separate process which the CS Lewis quip doesn't eliminate, imo.
So 3 variables, not merely P&Q. :)
Did that help?
-
Exactly what criggster says.
I agree with you both.
1:50
Modus Tollensby PhilosophyFreak7,785 views- 9:12
03 Ethics Pt 2 Modus Ponens, Modus Tollens, Hypothetical Syllogismby PhilosopherDena1,883 views
- 1:38
Greg Koukl On C.S. Lewisby Zondervancom2,855 views
- 10:01
"The Question of God": Sigmund Freud And C.S. Lewis - 4/6by hiperf2899,036 views
- 1:37
Modus tollensby Metacosmesis1,082 views
- 6:32
C.S. Lewis Interview Clipsby kurtbruner1060,579 views
- 6:30
Logic, 4 - the Rules (Take Notes)by MrCropper3,374 views
- 4:16
Exchange w/ Shawn 2: The Failure of Absolutismby jason666king355 views
- 8:13
Was CS Lewis a Calvinist?by CanonWired1,868 views
- 3:26
The Screwtape Letters, Max McLean: NYC production 10/07-01/08by FPAVideos76,802 views
- 10:03
Ideas re C. S. Lewis for phillippi2by Cimbolic205 views
- 9:57
RUU #10 - Intelligent Design and Modus Tollensby trondreitan2,401 views
- 4:42
C.S. Lewis Through The Shadowlands Trailerby DCMedia0011,142 views
- 2:10
Glossary-Modus Tollensby MrXMentorOfMath70 views
- 2:02
At CS Lewis' Grave: A Reflectionby TheWanderingtree145 views
- 1:25
Brooke Fraser - CS Lewis - New York City in-store june 25 2008by cold1441,817 views
- 2:10
John 17:3 and the fallacy of Denying the Antecedentby Blogrich551,375 views
- 3:31
conditionalsby headlessprofessor4,032 views
- 9:16
C.S Lewis's surviving BBC radio addressby gnosisandlight140,149 views
- 6:33
Logic, 12by MrCropper1,177 views
Clearly the lord is omnipresent....but was banned by the 'authorities' around 1300 years ago from being present in lying or lunacy or being within those stricken by them. But Jesus' ministry was clearly prior to the 1300 year boundary stone, therefore he is the lord even if he was a lying lunatic.
Cashify 2 years ago
This is a great comment, Cashify !
Cimbolic 2 years ago
Their "hidden assumption" is that the OR's are XOR's rather than ordinary disjunctions. Thus, they have a premise (without a consequent). Then, they assume the TRUTH of the premise, axiomatically, which is just flat-out bogus.
indignant99 2 years ago
Yes! The OR's are really XOR's.
I am very glad you see that.
Cimbolic 2 years ago