Fundamentally Very Much Stoned

Somewhere else Dawkins tenderly says that he wished to know how life emerged on the planet...

I imagine we - complex organisms, life -are quantum mechanically seated on the singularity wherefrom the universe emerged 12 billion years ago. Therefore life must emerge as a minimun action regulated process required in order to account for the configuration space of an evolving universe.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Richard
• Dawkins
• Lawrence
• Krauss
• Spinoza
• Galileo
• Newton
• Einstein
• Darwin
• Heredity
• Strong
• Principle
• of
• Equivalence
• Existential
• Quantum
• Hyperconnected
• Space
• Group
• Symmetries
• Topology
• Symmetry
• Break
• Consciousness
• Singularity

[mrqsilveira]

A stone occupies space (and time).... Curvature of spacetime... Ah... Ah... What?

[mrqsilveira]

"make people look foolish", it is an important observation, because Jesus said: "Be careful not to scandalize these little ones who I love."

[mrqsilveira]

Excellent view! Very good indeed! I appreciate your fine-tuning into this 'perverted' paradoxical polarization. I am not going to call Dawkins a Narcissist though, because I suspect I am a bit!

[Kostly]

The religiosity around the world has been perverted into something more akin to a straightjacket or a mind clamp. Science promotes a greater understanding through the seeking of truth. This is good. But, when science attempts to disprove something that cannot be disproven, it makes people look foolish. Just as the religious zealots look foolish talking about "the kingdom" or "hell". Dawkins, along with many others like Hitchens, are merely offended by the suggestion of a "God". Narcissism

[mrqsilveira]

Thanks! The energy that flows from Mr. Kaku is very reassuring! I just want to add on behalf of metaphysical-terrified people, specially Dawkins, who I admire as a scientist and idea promoter, that there's a strong polarization around the atheistic question in America, due to intrinsic fear that grabs and destroys the human soul. Dawkins real battle is against the clear dangerous corruption of passionate creationism. He only goes a bit too far pressed by this internal polarization pressure!

[Kostly]

Well said!

[mrqsilveira]

Thank you! You've got the idea. I've read "The Blind Whatchmaker" from Dawkins. He is simply charming and brilliant, although very much infatuated with an apparently boring atheism. Daniel Dennett and Christopher Hitchens are also bright thinkers and authors with an aggressive lively atheistic position that reminds of what teologian Paul Tillich (a genius) says about it: "Teism to be on track always need a bit of atheistic confrontation." In this sense, these guys do a fair good job!

[Kostly]

HAHAH I love this video!

I must say, Richard Dawkins is quite offensive when it comes to his "certainty" that no "God" exists. His book "God" delusion is a narcissist's treatise which attempts to close the door on the metaphysical. I have no respect for that. There are too many scientists in the world who respect the possibility of the Metaphysical. Micho Kaku is one.

[mrqsilveira]

(5:00) Stone being an Existential Quantum...

Bernard Shaw saying Mahommed freed the arabs from worshiping stones!...

2001, an odissey: The resilient attachment to the fundamental stone!...

[mrqsilveira]

(3:40) The paradox to meet ourselves at the border of the theoretical primitive singularity as immersed events at the present apparent sensitive singularity horizon might be explained by DNA being a hyperlinked hierarchy of discontinuities.

It is not that much ridiculously simple but it makes some dear sense, doens't it, guys?