WTC7 - The Flight of the Rubble Debris

The whole reason builidng 7 caught on fire was because debris from the north tower hit it, but how did the debris get there?

Category:

Education

Tags:

• WTC7
• 9/11
• WTC
• Controlled
• Demolition
• Craig
• Bartmer
• World
• Trade
• Center
• Inside
• Job
• Conspiracy
• False
• Flag

[davidkzoo]

everyone that has placed a response on this video has such spectacular grammar, I believe them all.....................

[ScootleRoyale]

on 9/11 tho when the top 15 floors of the north tower struck the bottom 95 .. not only did they not slow down... THEY SPED UP! - Impossible... violates every fundamental law of physics.

See here:

watch?v=xG2y50Wyys4

[ScootleRoyale]

Quick physics lesson - Every action has an equal and opposite reaction...

When a hammer strikes a nail. It exerts a much greater force on the nail than it would if it was simply resting against it ... agreed?

Well because of the above law ... that force works both ways causing the hammer to SLOW DOWN at impact ... agreed? ... Its common sense.

Ok now drop a 15 story building onto a 95 story building... whats going to happen? The 15 story building will SLOW DOWN after impact.

[ScootleRoyale]

I never said it was conclusive evidence... the physics is conclusive evidence... the comparisons are just food for thought.

As for the pentagon ... I believe A plane hit ... I believe the reason they're witholding the video is because they want truthers to think a plane didnt hit so they can discredit us... which is what they do ... the media never questions building 7, when they do their hitpieces they always focus on the pentagon conspiracies.

[CunnyFunt333]

Neither of them buildings were designed like the twin Towers and you're taking things way out of context and using examples that have got nothing to do with the price of cheese thats not conclusive evidence mate. What about the Pentagon? you'd think that a place so heavily guarded like the Pentagon would have more than 2 camera's...but as far as the World Trade Center goes those buildings came down because 2 big planes hit them at 600 mph and i doubt i will ever be convinced otherwise.

[ScootleRoyale]

Here's video of a building in china that was recently demolished in an explosion

watch?v=GVQaVgJne6c

And here's a video of a fire induced progessive collapse of a low rise building in holland (the only thing remotely comparable to anything that happened on 9/11)

watch?v=bizr86N-4nc

(Fast forward to 0.45)

What do you think looks more like the towers?

[ScootleRoyale]

I did A level physics so I know the fundamentals... when it comes to physics the fundamental laws are never violated no matter how advanced u go ... if ur applying the advanced stuff in a way that violates the basics... ur applying them wrong... the collapse of the three buildings on 9/11 violates the fundamental laws of physics ... Newton's laws, the conservation of momentum and energy etc... add that to the fact that there are no examples of such a collapse outside 9/11 and u've got a problem

[CunnyFunt333]

Do you have a physics degree mate? I'm not saying it could but i am saying stranger things have happened. I must say but your footage has been far more compelling than that Loose Change shite.

[ScootleRoyale]

Doesn't explain how a huge 20+ tonne chunk of building was thrown 350 sideways at 60mph. ... The amount of kenetic energy required to do that is comparible to the kinetic energy a racecar has at 200mph... air between floors could not eject huge chunks of building with so much force.

[CunnyFunt333]

It's all nonsense man a plane flying 600mph into a 100 floor structure design like the wtc, it isnt really that difficult to believe they failed. It's a tube within a tube hense if 10 floors fail then the weight and pressure is going to make the other floors fail and thats why the building hit at a lower point collapsed first.