WTC 1&2 UNIQUE DESIGN.
Loading...
Top Comments
All Comments (82)
-
just incredible, it took 7 years to build the towers, and it took 102 minutes to destroy them
-
I like how some of the best documentaries involving anything, especially 9/11, have a British narrator and/or are funded by a British television station. There's just something about a calm British accent that makes documentaries like this seem better for having it.
-
how moronic, The drywall has nothing to do with the structure.
Also the spines of the building could stand on their own. The lower floors the beams were two feet by four feet and five inches thick.
Please explain how a fire that burns less than 1200 degrees could even phase this building. Ooops maybe the thermite could.
-
“Yama ‘ Architech Of Terror”
“The World Trade Center was Yamasaki’s most prestigious, highly visible commission.
... Yamasaki HAD ENGINEERED HIS TOWERS TO WITHSTAND THE FORCE OF A 747 SHEARING INTO THEM-THE NIGHTMARE SCENARIO OF AN EARLIER, MORE “INNOCENT” ERA...
Page 117
“Divided We Stand: A Biography of New York’s World Trade Center”
Eric Darton (1999)
-
Technically they did not need to fail simultaneously to give the appearance that it does. Some individuals could fail seconds earlier increasing the strain on all the other columns
-
The towers fell straight down because that's the direction in which gravity acts.
There would have to have been an immense sideways force applied for them to do anything else.
The columns failed virtually simultaneously because the failure point overload was applied virtually simultaneously.
-
Ok, thanks.
-
that was in 2001 not 1993
-
Along with using United and American airline flights to crash into them with.
7:17
WTC Structural Designby WorIdTradeCenter8,969 views- 9:02
9/11 BILL O'RIELLY AND JAMES MEIGS ON NUTTY CTS.by 911TRUTHINATOR1,116 views
- 0:48
WTC Design (Part 1)by muzicmaker20016,261 views
- 10:58
9/11TRUTH WTC 2.FACTS.by 911TRUTHINATOR4,989 views
- 7:10
9/11 WTC STEEL STUDY.by 911TRUTHINATOR6,608 views
- 1:57
green Renewable Energy Roof Top wind Powerby JONOVID52,458 views
- 1:12
WTC Design (Part 3)by muzicmaker20011,852 views
- 3:58
9/11 Debunked: On WTC's Design to Withstand 707 Impactby RKOwens415,529 views
- 1:19
The Twin Towers 2by Maxiedude1314,525 views
- 5:22
911 Smoking Gun: North Tower Explodingby 911Infowarrior2,256 views
- 6:47
9/11 WTC. PLANES THRU STEEL.by 911TRUTHINATOR7,440 views
- 10:09
911 twin towers crash footageby nwodetox5,032,024 views
- 9:57
World Trade Center Tower Construction (PBS)by Xenomorph911WTC50,070 views
- 2:09
AE911TRUTH PLAYSCHOOL WITH RICHARD GAGE.by 911TRUTHINATOR18,290 views
- 1:32
3d animation | Wind Power | Anifex computer animation | Industrial Design | Product Designby Anifex3d61,191 views
- 10:50
9/11 WTC 1.by 911TRUTHINATOR3,330 views
- 0:47
Proof of NO Controlled Demolitions - South Tower 9/11 RAREby bryankelly85,017 views
- 3:56
9 11 lost filesby 911lostfiles15,113 views
- 1:49
Unveiling the future World Trade Centerby TubeGasp528,349 views
"Excatly thy pull it as in controlled demolition"
"Pull" in demolition terms means to pull the building down with cables...did you see any cables on WTC7? "Pull in fireman's terms means to pull out of the building.
"no way a 110 stories could of fell in 10 seconds "
How about 78 floors in 15 seconds? Or 93 floors in 18 seconds? The planes didn't hit the 110th floors.
"even if it did fall at seconds a floor"
Who says it can't fall faster? Oh
yeah, "clunkity clunk" right?
DkEugen 3 years ago 4
@usd25674
Truthers REALLY hate the truth, don't they?
911Doufus 1 year ago 2