Federer Agassi USO 2005 Final Highlights Part 1
Top Comments
All Comments (203)
-
3:05 reminds me of semis against djokovic :(
-
FEd is a spoiled cry baby- like all genius people-Just take a look at some of his matches from his younger days. He never gives opponents credit, but always comes up with something ridiculous to dis his opponents. He can't understand how jok. could hit such a return on match point-"I was brought up to play with hard work and talent"-claiming that his shot was luck not skill. Jokovic does it all the time in big moments-he was just pissed and embarassed that he lost again to him again.
-
FEd is most talented yes-but has had gimme draws every grand slam, while the few who can beat him don't and are out of gas when they play him. Plus he always serves first thus giving him an imm. advantage from the start. If u can beat him in the first set he is only a 500 player. Then there are the matches where his opp. have myst. collapsed when blowing him off the court- Haas and Berdych being the two obvious ones. Fed can't stand the joker cause he can now outlast him. He disses him
-
Wow! His shots were much deeper and he hit the ball harder than he is doing now. He also took more chances and more importantly pulled them off!
-
This was probably the last match agassi played his best.There were some ridiculously good points agassi played.
When federer first started dominating,He was like the djokovic of today.Consider this,Federer was hewitt's bitch at first,but from 2003 onwards.Federer destroyed hewitt,made him lost his manhood especially at USO 2004.
Djokovic now is on the verge of doing the same thing to Nadal
-
Every champion has one last great match, much like Sampras had in 2002 after everyone said he didn't have what it took to win a major anymore he took the US Open. Now people are saying the same about Federer now and it's totally unjustified! Federer still has the ability to win!
-
This match was such a good one, its almost a waste of time to only show the Federer points; Agassi had some that were as good as his.
-
@darthhelmethead Davydenko too gets the ball early but noone sees it ..
-
To all those who don't give Federer the credit of beating Andre,and say that Roger struggled against a 34-yr old is plain unfair to the both of them;Andre is one of the greatest athlete in tennis(notwithstanding the meth that he took,which may have prolonged his career that little bit),a legend in his own right,but Roger is the GOAT for now,when all is said and done;as for lack of competition,thts a total misconception....
-
Its a shame that Agassi retired...
I think parts of federer's game have actaully improved.. his second serve, his backhand, his net work. I think the thing is that, there is more competition now... nadal, djokovic, del potro. BUT i still think federer has it.. i mean he got to all major finals in 2009 and won 2!!! hardly losing it! I think the quality of players has increased because of federer, i don't believe nadal, djokovic or any of the male player would be as good if it were not for roger! KING FOR LIFE!
eveevie 2 years ago 31
Federer doesn't get nearly enough credit for being able to take the ball on the rise as well as Agassi, whose career was defined by that skill.
darthhelmethead 2 years ago 25