"How does Image Search traffic compare to Web Search traffic? On a busy site with badly named images, should I expect an increase in traffic if I give all images descriptive names?"
Hey Matt (or other Google Superstar)...Will naming the images on a web page help the google bots determine what that page is about? or is this a waste of time?
From my experience the increase in image traffic is offset by users who steal your pictures. I am constantly fighting back against those who use my pictures on their web sites without asking permission. They even still have my visible watermark showing.
A highly ranked image within Google images is nice, but be prepared to spend some time fighting image thieves.
I have to agree. It is indeed almost clear that if you search for "dog" via image search you will most likely find images named "dog.***" and pictures that are near content that targets a "dog" issue.
I think the more interesting part would be, can descriptive names for images near appropriate content increase my traffic? And how important are alt tags and title tags in this question.
Does the length of the image name matters? For example if you name your image "Should-I-expect-increased-traffic-if-I-optimize-my-images.jpg". Sometimes you want to be more specific, so you use a longer name, but does that matter to google or will it just ignore the (really) long image names?
I thanks both of you, Liam and Matt, making this thing very clear because sometime a photo tells thousand of words and pictorial explanation much better than texts. Another fact is a quality photo does edifies many viewers.
That is why I uploaded my photos/images to Picasa Web Album before upload it to my weblog site. Register - Caption, Multi-tagging, people (facial recognition), map, etc.
Thanks Matt, some sound advice.
ResumeRescue 1 week ago
Hey Matt (or other Google Superstar)...Will naming the images on a web page help the google bots determine what that page is about? or is this a waste of time?
Techlinz 1 month ago
As good as the usual.
agapitoflores001 2 months ago
From my experience the increase in image traffic is offset by users who steal your pictures. I am constantly fighting back against those who use my pictures on their web sites without asking permission. They even still have my visible watermark showing.
A highly ranked image within Google images is nice, but be prepared to spend some time fighting image thieves.
MyWebs 2 years ago
I have to agree. It is indeed almost clear that if you search for "dog" via image search you will most likely find images named "dog.***" and pictures that are near content that targets a "dog" issue.
I think the more interesting part would be, can descriptive names for images near appropriate content increase my traffic? And how important are alt tags and title tags in this question.
jackprince1983 2 years ago
Does the length of the image name matters? For example if you name your image "Should-I-expect-increased-traffic-if-I-optimize-my-images.jpg". Sometimes you want to be more specific, so you use a longer name, but does that matter to google or will it just ignore the (really) long image names?
skynetF1 2 years ago
This was an obvious answer.
almightyvegeta87 2 years ago
very good as usual
sayweb 2 years ago
I thanks both of you, Liam and Matt, making this thing very clear because sometime a photo tells thousand of words and pictorial explanation much better than texts. Another fact is a quality photo does edifies many viewers.
That is why I uploaded my photos/images to Picasa Web Album before upload it to my weblog site. Register - Caption, Multi-tagging, people (facial recognition), map, etc.
MichaelDadona 2 years ago 2
...unless you wanna rank for the number of the beast on google images!
garethjax 2 years ago