Classic Modern Propaganda

A critique following the interview with the Victoria 9/11 Truth. Canada wants an thorough, open investigation about the events of 9/11.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Victoria
• 9/11
• truth
• Brian
• Burchill
• media
• free
• press
• Shaw
• tv
• critique
• propaganda
• canada
• news
• politics

[Meirstein]

Shut up you un-patriotic douchbags. Think about what you are saying. Why would the government kill 3000 of its own citizens. It was 19 terrorists who hijacked 4 of our airliners. Everything isn't a conspiracy, things can be as the media said they are.

[IonUCanada]

Simple questions..... can you name one government or civilization in the past that HASN'T killed and sacrificed their own people for a greater agenda? Have you opened any history book? Wake up fool!

ps-If you are going to read, read the "9/11 Commission" and find out what happened to WTC 7. Save yourself, and your country. Stop being ignorant and lazy, investigate it yourself. It will come out one day.

[JosephMelia]

Military Industrio complex false flag operation.

collateral.Murder,treachery,li­es.

A sorry day for true Americans.

Demolition a la thermate.The twin towers were full of asbestos,war is profitable for Bush partners,the Carlyle group.

Saudi Arabia wasn't even attacked afterward,The so called hijackers appeared in other countries later.Bin Ladens flown out,evidence covered up.I'd subscribe to most,if not all which was put forward by the documentary "Loose Change"Watch it on youtube or google.

[SexiestPenguin]

I think the key word are in the video desription, "thorough" "open" and "investigation". If this is indeed simply what it appears, a terrorist attack, then this investigation would help find best ways to prevent it from happening again, If not, then that truth will be found. Refusing to consider open disclosure only feeds the appearance of a "cover-up"

[dhdigi]

@Meirstein dont bother trying to reason with them. they can think what they want. theyll just be wrong.

[TheLincolnWorld]

@Meirstein Exactly. The war damaged the oil fields. Either way 9/11 was still a excuse to attack western Asian countries. Now when the oil was initially taken gas prices went down. Common sense. The more you have of it the less its worth.

[Meirstein]

@TheLincolnWorld I can't find anywhere that says they did, so I'm going to have to assume that the thing was mostly done through aircraft carriers, and airbases in allied countries such as Kuwait. Also, they're producing less oil because the oilfields were damaged in the war and pipelines are still targets for insurgents and terrorists.

[TheLincolnWorld]

@Meirstein It still doesn't mean they didn't use the airfield at all for the invasion. If they are producing oil levels far below their 2003.. Put 2 and 2 together and you can probably figure out why that is.

[Meirstein]

@TheLincolnWorld You might be right if it weren't true that Iraq is still producing oil far below their 2003 levels, actually reducing the amount that comes to the US. While Baghram is an important asset in the war on terror, its main purpose is for launching airstrikes and drones for work in Afghanistan and Pakistan. For the invasion of Iraq, aircraft carriers were used for the most part.

[TheLincolnWorld]

@Meirstein There are still benefits from invading Afghanistan. One benefit is a established military base/Airfields w.e . Airfield such as Bagram Airfield is probably a very important supply point. I am also 100% it was used for the Invasion of Iraq. Maybe my economic theory is wrong but either way we still got oil some how through military intervention as a result of 9/11.

[Meirstein]

@TheLincolnWorld Afghanistan in 2001 was not a major oil-producing nation. It was actually on the bottom of the world economically. Gas prices in the early 2000's, especially after 9/11, fluctuated wildly. We still aren't getting any oil from Afghanistan, and China and japan just got major mining rights to their minerals, so there goes your economic theory.

[TheLincolnWorld]

@Meirstein Killing 3000 citizens can give American a reason for war. Given that reason it allows the U.S to invade a country that make house "Terrorist". So with America crying for war and Afghanistan having the possibility of having Al Qaeda they invaded Afghanistan. When the U.S and ally forces invaded gas prices went down to about 40 cents/L. Hmm I wonder why gas prices went down when Afghanistan was invade. So the 9/11 attack was a excuse for the US to gain oil from a oil rich country.

[DarkAnderebu]

@Meirstein "Why would the government kill 3000 of its own citizens." Why did they kill our own citizens to get us involved in World War 1? Do you know about the illegal selling of weapons to England during WW1 and the use of cruise ships to do it secretly? I'm not saying I believe this, but I still look into it because it's interesting to me. If it's true then it's horrible. Either way I want whoever is truly responsible to pay.

[8thDM3NSHN]

@JL897139 lol common sense no?