PRO-CHOICE-RS WANT ME DEAD !!!!!!!!!!!!!??????
Uploader Comments (theprolifeguy)
Top Comments
-
It's you anti-abortion morons who are the ones shooting down doctors in cold blood not the atheists. You people don't deserve the title: ProLife ! Pro death, pro stupidity is more like it.
All Comments (625)
-
I hope someone shoots you.
-
@Sickopath333 Well, being that I'm trying to argue that an apple is red and you counter that I'm wrong because a banana is yellow. I hoped that clarification would help, but to continue along this line would be insanity.
Fare thee well.
-
@putzthewondersloth You expect me to agree with you when your point, albeit technically correct, is invalid?
No. It isn't a relevant or worthwhile distinction though for the reasons I've already outlined.
-
@Sickopath333 Now you're just being argumentative.
Here's a very simple yes or no for you: Can a one-month-old live outside of its mother's womb?
-
@putzthewondersloth Okay, take your wording there, and apply it to the unborn baby. A typical home environment [woman's womb] will not kill an infant if there is some adult [the mother] there to care for it [eats right, doesn't do drugs, what not]. Dependency or personal sustainability isn't really the determining factor and it shouldn't be because dependence will vary widely case to case. A 10 year old will sometimes have to take care of themselves while a 35 year old will be like a kid.
-
@Sickopath333 This is true. A newborn after a full term does have fully-formed organs, bones, muscles, etc. A typical home's environment will not kill an infant if there is some adult there to care for it. I am not against adoption. However, a baby one month after conception is simply not capable of surviving outside of a womb, even if cared for. I don't believe medical science could even transfer such a baby to another woman's womb.
-
@putzthewondersloth Umm, no, not at all. It's simple to disprove this idea. Take a child who is born full term and just leave it be for a while. It can't take care of itself, this independent human being, because it is entirely dependent: therefore it is not human? Dependency is not a factor in whether or not you're human; legally adults can claim their child as a dependent until age 24 I believe (give or take a few years, I don't know the law on that 100%).
-
So are all your arguements as accurate as you having read the constitution 50,000,000 times?
But I digress. If a woman were to decide that she no longer wanted her baby after a month and elected to have it removed, unharmed, isn't it the fault of the child, this supposedly independant human being, for not surviving? Or prehaps there is some merit to the fact that the embryo is still a part of the woman.
Discuss.
-
Your right man I am pro life and any decent Christian should be keep up the good word.
-
@theprolifeguy The Facts? According to who? A Marxists Scholars?
pro-choice people aren't predisposed to violence or threatening death or actually killing someone say like roeder did. your overblown ego is feeding you a line. most of us feel it is up to the person involved and their circumstances that dictate the best decision for them. pro-life is an oxymoron in an environment where guns and violent deaths plague this society. I would like a law where some people could be tied up and made to watch other people minding their own business. I dream.....
Mutedvox 1 year ago
@Mutedvox First,I do not agree with violence...now the facts...There have been over 100 prolifers killed by prochoicers at rallies since 1991...in the late 90s a prolife radio talk show host was murdered in his own living room by a crazy prochoicer.....Since that time some crazy prolifers killed about 5 abortion doctors...Dr.Tiller himself killed over 60,000 babies
theprolifeguy 1 year ago 3